HCBC
Price
$36.35
Change
+$5.04 (+16.10%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
36.63M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NWG
Price
$18.95
Change
-$0.13 (-0.68%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
74.6B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HCBC vs NWG

Header iconHCBC vs NWG Comparison
Open Charts HCBC vs NWGBanner chart's image
High Country Ban
Price$36.35
Change+$5.04 (+16.10%)
Volume$9.04K
Capitalization36.63M
NatWest Group
Price$18.95
Change-$0.13 (-0.68%)
Volume$26.58K
Capitalization74.6B
HCBC vs NWG Comparison Chart in %
HCBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NWG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HCBC vs. NWG commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HCBC is a Buy and NWG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (HCBC: $36.35 vs. NWG: $19.07)
Brand notoriety: HCBC and NWG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HCBC: 241% vs. NWG: 157%
Market capitalization -- HCBC: $36.63M vs. NWG: $75.84B
HCBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $36.63M. NWG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $75.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $162.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HCBC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNWG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HCBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NWG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWG is a better buy in the long-term than HCBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HCBC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HCBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NWG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NWG is a better buy in the short-term than HCBC.

Price Growth

HCBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.18% price change this week, while NWG (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

NWG is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.10% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWG($74.6B) has a higher market cap than HCBC($36.6M). NWG has higher P/E ratio than HCBC: NWG (10.83) vs HCBC (8.47). NWG YTD gains are higher at: 8.971 vs. HCBC (-0.384). HCBC has less debt than NWG: HCBC (43.7M) vs NWG (6.14B). NWG has higher revenues than HCBC: NWG (16.1B) vs HCBC (24M).
HCBCNWGHCBC / NWG
Capitalization36.6M74.6B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.3848.971-4%
P/E Ratio8.4710.8378%
Revenue24M16.1B0%
Total Cash9.62MN/A-
Total Debt43.7M6.14B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HCBC vs NWG: Fundamental Ratings
HCBC
NWG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1516
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
632
SMR RATING
1..100
675
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4841
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7722
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCBC's Valuation (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWG (85) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HCBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWG’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCBC (63) in the null industry. This means that NWG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's SMR Rating (5) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCBC (67) in the null industry. This means that NWG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HCBC (48) in the null industry. This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCBC (77) in the null industry. This means that NWG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HCBCNWG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HCBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NWG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NTEI0.080.02
+26.17%
Nova Tech Enterprises, Inc.
CHJTF1.20N/A
N/A
CSPC Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd.
CYBQY1.64N/A
N/A
Cyberdyne Inc.
NCHEY12.10N/A
N/A
Nichirei Corp
DMFG61.00N/A
N/A
Decker Manufacturing Corp.

HCBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCBC and MCHB have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCBC and MCHB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCBC
1D Price
Change %
HCBC100%
+0.14%
MCHB - HCBC
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
BSBK - HCBC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
LSFG - HCBC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWG - HCBC
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
FSFG - HCBC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NWG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWG has been closely correlated with LYG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NWG jumps, then LYG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWG
1D Price
Change %
NWG100%
+1.33%
LYG - NWG
75%
Closely correlated
+1.30%
BCS - NWG
68%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
DB - NWG
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
UBS - NWG
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
BBVA - NWG
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
More