HBUV
Price
$1.30
Change
+$0.02 (+1.56%)
Updated
Oct 30 closing price
Capitalization
34.11M
HNLGF
Price
$1.78
Change
+$0.41 (+29.93%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.45B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HBUV vs HNLGF

Header iconHBUV vs HNLGF Comparison
Open Charts HBUV vs HNLGFBanner chart's image
Hubilu Venture
Price$1.30
Change+$0.02 (+1.56%)
Volume$309
Capitalization34.11M
Hang Lung Group
Price$1.78
Change+$0.41 (+29.93%)
Volume$934
Capitalization2.45B
HBUV vs HNLGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HNLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBUV vs. HNLGF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBUV is a Hold and HNLGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (HBUV: $1.30 vs. HNLGF: $1.78)
Brand notoriety: HBUV and HNLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBUV: 100% vs. HNLGF: 12%
Market capitalization -- HBUV: $34.11M vs. HNLGF: $2.45B
HBUV [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $34.11M. HNLGF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $2.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBUV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHNLGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HBUV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HNLGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HNLGF is a better buy in the long-term than HBUV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HNLGF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HNLGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

HBUV (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HNLGF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+3.18% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HNLGF($2.45B) has a higher market cap than HBUV($34.1M). HNLGF YTD gains are higher at: 61.349 vs. HBUV (0.000). HNLGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.22B vs. HBUV (1.05M). HNLGF has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. HBUV (53.7K). HBUV has less debt than HNLGF: HBUV (21.1M) vs HNLGF (58.1B). HNLGF has higher revenues than HBUV: HNLGF (11.8B) vs HBUV (2.1M).
HBUVHNLGFHBUV / HNLGF
Capitalization34.1M2.45B1%
EBITDA1.05M5.22B0%
Gain YTD0.00061.349-
P/E RatioN/A13.43-
Revenue2.1M11.8B0%
Total Cash53.7K10.8B0%
Total Debt21.1M58.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBUV vs HNLGF: Fundamental Ratings
HBUV
HNLGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3646
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54100
SMR RATING
1..100
10098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3438
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
517
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HNLGF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBUV (79). This means that HNLGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBUV’s over the last 12 months.

HBUV's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HNLGF (100). This means that HBUV’s stock grew somewhat faster than HNLGF’s over the last 12 months.

HNLGF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as HBUV (100). This means that HNLGF’s stock grew similarly to HBUV’s over the last 12 months.

HBUV's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as HNLGF (38). This means that HBUV’s stock grew similarly to HNLGF’s over the last 12 months.

HNLGF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBUV (51). This means that HNLGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBUV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBUVHNLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HNLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGTLF0.060.01
+23.46%
Argent BioPharma Limited
GIVSY23.65N/A
N/A
Grupo De Inversiones Suramericana S.A.
MVLY15.40N/A
N/A
Mission Valley Bancorp
CWXZF7.01-0.05
-0.71%
Doman Building Materials Group Ltd.
CKHGY103.58-1.05
-1.00%
Capitec Bank Holdings Ltd

HBUV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HBUV and GYRO have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HBUV and GYRO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBUV
1D Price
Change %
HBUV100%
N/A
GYRO - HBUV
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.52%
UOKA - HBUV
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
SWPFF - HBUV
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AZLCZ - HBUV
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
HNLGF - HBUV
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HNLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HNLGF and HLPPY have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HNLGF and HLPPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HNLGF
1D Price
Change %
HNLGF100%
N/A
HLPPY - HNLGF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.58%
HLPPF - HNLGF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
HNLGY - HNLGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBUV - HNLGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HYSNF - HNLGF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A