Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBSGX vs WCMNX
HBSGX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts HBSGX vs WCMNX
Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS IB
Price$22.94
Change+$0.38 (+1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets560.62M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.85
Change+$0.20 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
HBSGX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBSGX vs. WCMNX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBSGX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBSGX has more cash in the bank: 561M vs. WCMNX (44.4M). HBSGX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: HBSGX (2.65) vs WCMNX (0.00). HBSGX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: HBSGX (24 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than HBSGX (0.90). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HBSGX (69.00). HBSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: HBSGX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.37 vs. HBSGX (-21.56). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.74 vs. HBSGX (-31.08).
| HBSGX | WCMNX | HBSGX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.24 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.04 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.526 | 7.486 | -194% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 561M | 44.4M | 1,264% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.56 | -1.37 | 1,570% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.73 | 21.03 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.08 | 0.74 | -4,209% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement