Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBSGX vs WCMLX
HBSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts HBSGX vs WCMLX
Hartford Small Cap Growth HLS IB
Price$21.65
Change-$0.84 (-3.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets532.78M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.25
Change-$0.44 (-3.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
HBSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBSGX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBSGX has more cash in the bank: 533M vs. WCMLX (41.9M). HBSGX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: HBSGX (2.67) vs WCMLX (0.00). HBSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: HBSGX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than HBSGX (0.90). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. HBSGX (69.00). HBSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: HBSGX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.98 vs. HBSGX (-20.10). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 4.74 vs. HBSGX (-28.14).
| HBSGX | WCMLX | HBSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.99 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.79 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.640 | 6.454 | -227% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 533M | 41.9M | 1,272% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.10 | -2.98 | 675% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.26 | 22.89 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.14 | 4.74 | -593% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers