HBNC
Price
$17.60
Change
-$0.07 (-0.40%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
901.43M
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBWM
Price
$49.03
Change
-$0.12 (-0.24%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
796.91M
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HBNC vs MBWM

Header iconHBNC vs MBWM Comparison
Open Charts HBNC vs MBWMBanner chart's image
Horizon Ban
Price$17.60
Change-$0.07 (-0.40%)
Volume$224.47K
Capitalization901.43M
Mercantile Bank
Price$49.03
Change-$0.12 (-0.24%)
Volume$66.32K
Capitalization796.91M
HBNC vs MBWM Comparison Chart in %
HBNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBNC vs. MBWM commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBNC is a StrongBuy and MBWM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (HBNC: $17.60 vs. MBWM: $49.03)
Brand notoriety: HBNC and MBWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBNC: 61% vs. MBWM: 89%
Market capitalization -- HBNC: $901.43M vs. MBWM: $796.91M
HBNC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $901.43M. MBWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $796.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBNC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMBWM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HBNC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MBWM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than HBNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBNC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBWM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HBNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MBWM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the short-term than HBNC.

Price Growth

HBNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.92% price change this week, while MBWM (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

HBNC is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.01% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBNC($901M) has a higher market cap than MBWM($797M). HBNC has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: HBNC (13.73) vs MBWM (9.30). HBNC YTD gains are higher at: 13.904 vs. MBWM (12.931). HBNC (102M) and MBWM (98.9M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . HBNC has less debt than MBWM: HBNC (459M) vs MBWM (487M). MBWM has higher revenues than HBNC: MBWM (239M) vs HBNC (-82.17M).
HBNCMBWMHBNC / MBWM
Capitalization901M797M113%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.90412.931108%
P/E Ratio13.739.30148%
Revenue-82.17M239M-34%
Total Cash102M98.9M103%
Total Debt459M487M94%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBNC vs MBWM: Fundamental Ratings
HBNC
MBWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
656
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7119
SMR RATING
1..100
9126
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4749
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9846
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBWM's Valuation (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBNC (52). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to HBNC’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBNC (71). This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBNC’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's SMR Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBNC (91). This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBNC’s over the last 12 months.

HBNC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (49). This means that HBNC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBNC (98). This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBNCMBWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HBNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SILVX17.760.05
+0.28%
SGI US Large Cap Equity I
DTSGX18.850.04
+0.21%
Wilshire Small Company Growth Invmt
PLGJX8.680.01
+0.12%
Principal LargeCap Growth I J
QQMNX22.400.01
+0.04%
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral IS
JFEIX42.17-0.04
-0.09%
JPMorgan Europe Dynamic L

HBNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBNC has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBNC jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBNC
1D Price
Change %
HBNC100%
-0.40%
FMBH - HBNC
87%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
PEBO - HBNC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
MBWM - HBNC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
BY - HBNC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
UVSP - HBNC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
More