Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLVX vs WBAIX
HBLVX vs WBAIX Comparison
Open Charts HBLVX vs WBAIX
Hartford Balanced Income R6
Price$15.31
Change-$0.08 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.68B
Weitz Conservative Allocation-Instl Cl
Price$17.12
Change-$0.05 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets222.39M
HBLVX vs WBAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLVX vs. WBAIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLVX is a Buy and WBAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLVX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. WBAIX (222M). HBLVX pays higher dividends than WBAIX: HBLVX (3.54) vs WBAIX (2.09). HBLVX was incepted earlier than WBAIX: HBLVX (11 years) vs WBAIX (7 years). WBAIX (0.76) is less costly to investors than HBLVX (0.56). HBLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. WBAIX (25.00). HBLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBAIX: HBLVX (0) vs WBAIX (1000000). HBLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.04 vs. WBAIX (-2.09). WBAIX return over 5 years is better than : 17.42 vs. HBLVX (16.16).
| HBLVX | WBAIX | HBLVX / WBAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.70 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.76 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.920 | 2.657 | 373% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 222M | 5,270% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.54 | 2.09 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.04 | -2.09 | -193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.82 | 15.85 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.16 | 17.42 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers