Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLVX vs RMYCX
HBLVX vs RMYCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLVX vs RMYCX
Hartford Balanced Income R6
Price$15.27
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.81B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income C
Price$9.96
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets294.93M
HBLVX vs RMYCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLVX vs. RMYCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLVX is a Hold and RMYCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLVX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. RMYCX (295M). RMYCX pays higher dividends than HBLVX: RMYCX (4.58) vs HBLVX (3.54). HBLVX was incepted earlier than RMYCX: HBLVX (11 years) vs RMYCX (10 years). RMYCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than HBLVX (0.56). RMYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. HBLVX (61.00). HBLVX (0) and RMYCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.04 vs. HBLVX (2.56). RMYCX return over 5 years is better than : 19.79 vs. HBLVX (17.91).
| HBLVX | RMYCX | HBLVX / RMYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.75 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.92 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.062 | 11.240 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 295M | 4,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.54 | 4.58 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.56 | 7.04 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.52 | 35.67 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.91 | 19.79 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.80 | 32.20 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers