Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLVX vs RMYCX
HBLVX vs RMYCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLVX vs RMYCX
Hartford Balanced Income R6
Price$15.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.68B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income C
Price$10.00
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.06M
HBLVX vs RMYCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLVX vs. RMYCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLVX is a StrongBuy and RMYCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLVX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. RMYCX (292M). RMYCX pays higher dividends than HBLVX: RMYCX (5.02) vs HBLVX (3.48). HBLVX was incepted earlier than RMYCX: HBLVX (11 years) vs RMYCX (11 years). RMYCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than HBLVX (0.56). RMYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. HBLVX (61.00). HBLVX (0) and RMYCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.84 vs. HBLVX (6.75). RMYCX return over 5 years is better than : 13.85 vs. HBLVX (11.85).
| HBLVX | RMYCX | HBLVX / RMYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.75 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.92 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.134 | 11.687 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 292M | 4,007% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.48 | 5.02 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.75 | 10.84 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.01 | 28.32 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.85 | 13.85 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.69 | 35.44 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers