Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLVX vs RMYCX
HBLVX vs RMYCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLVX vs RMYCX
Hartford Balanced Income R6
Price$15.18
Change-$0.08 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.76B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income C
Price$9.93
Change+$0.03 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.58M
HBLVX vs RMYCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLVX vs. RMYCX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLVX is a StrongBuy and RMYCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLVX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. RMYCX (294M). RMYCX pays higher dividends than HBLVX: RMYCX (4.66) vs HBLVX (3.53). HBLVX was incepted earlier than RMYCX: HBLVX (11 years) vs RMYCX (10 years). RMYCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than HBLVX (0.56). RMYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. HBLVX (61.00). HBLVX (0) and RMYCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.82 vs. HBLVX (2.35). RMYCX (20.40) and HBLVX (20.31) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HBLVX | RMYCX | HBLVX / RMYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.75 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.92 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.420 | 10.286 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 294M | 4,014% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.53 | 4.66 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.35 | 4.82 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.53 | 35.32 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.31 | 20.40 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.95 | 35.02 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers