Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLVX vs MNMCX
HBLVX vs MNMCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLVX vs MNMCX
Hartford Balanced Income R6
Price$15.09
Change-$0.17 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.64B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$14.69
Change-$0.40 (-2.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets290.51M
HBLVX vs MNMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLVX vs. MNMCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLVX is a StrongBuy and MNMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLVX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. MNMCX (291M). HBLVX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: HBLVX (3.46) vs MNMCX (1.18). HBLVX was incepted earlier than MNMCX: HBLVX (11 years) vs MNMCX (16 years). MNMCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than HBLVX (0.56). HBLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. MNMCX (70.00). HBLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNMCX: HBLVX (0) vs MNMCX (2000). HBLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.46 vs. MNMCX (2.81). HBLVX return over 5 years is better than : 13.00 vs. MNMCX (-1.55).
| HBLVX | MNMCX | HBLVX / MNMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.81 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.81 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.097 | 0.410 | 511% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 291M | 3,986% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.46 | 1.18 | 294% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.46 | 2.81 | 230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.82 | 14.19 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.00 | -1.55 | -837% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.73 | 12.90 | 440% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers