Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLVX vs MNMCX
HBLVX vs MNMCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLVX vs MNMCX
Hartford Balanced Income R6
Price$15.31
Change-$0.08 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.68B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term L
Price$15.12
Change-$0.09 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.22M
HBLVX vs MNMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLVX vs. MNMCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLVX is a Buy and MNMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLVX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. MNMCX (299M). HBLVX pays higher dividends than MNMCX: HBLVX (3.54) vs MNMCX (1.42). HBLVX was incepted earlier than MNMCX: HBLVX (11 years) vs MNMCX (16 years). MNMCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than HBLVX (0.56). HBLVX (61.00) and MNMCX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNMCX: HBLVX (0) vs MNMCX (2000). HBLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.04 vs. MNMCX (3.72). HBLVX return over 5 years is better than : 16.16 vs. MNMCX (-2.89).
| HBLVX | MNMCX | HBLVX / MNMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.81 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.81 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.920 | 7.491 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 299M | 3,913% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.54 | 1.42 | 250% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.04 | 3.72 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.82 | 22.33 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.16 | -2.89 | -559% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.66 | 9.94 | 520% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers