Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs WBALX
HBLSX vs WBALX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs WBALX
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$15.17
Change-$0.08 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.68B
Weitz Conservative Allocation-Inv Cl
Price$17.06
Change-$0.06 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets223.8M
HBLSX vs WBALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. WBALX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Buy and WBALX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. WBALX (224M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than WBALX: HBLSX (3.19) vs WBALX (1.99). HBLSX was incepted earlier than WBALX: HBLSX (15 years) vs WBALX (22 years). WBALX (1.00) and HBLSX (0.96) have similar cost to investors . HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. WBALX (25.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBALX: HBLSX (0) vs WBALX (2500). HBLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.24 vs. WBALX (-2.26). WBALX return over 5 years is better than : 16.56 vs. HBLSX (13.28).
| HBLSX | WBALX | HBLSX / WBALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.85 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.00 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.028 | 2.516 | 359% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 224M | 5,223% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.19 | 1.99 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.24 | -2.26 | -144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.02 | 15.32 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.28 | 16.56 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.57 | 40.57 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers