Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs WBALX
HBLSX vs WBALX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs WBALX
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$15.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.91B
Weitz Conservative Allocation-Inv Cl
Price$17.05
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets235.49M
HBLSX vs WBALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. WBALX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a StrongBuy and WBALX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. WBALX (235M). HBLSX pays higher dividends than WBALX: HBLSX (3.24) vs WBALX (2.00). HBLSX was incepted earlier than WBALX: HBLSX (15 years) vs WBALX (22 years). WBALX (1.02) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. WBALX (25.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBALX: HBLSX (0) vs WBALX (2500). HBLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.12 vs. WBALX (0.26). WBALX return over 5 years is better than : 20.56 vs. HBLSX (14.65).
| HBLSX | WBALX | HBLSX / WBALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.85 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.02 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.094 | 2.096 | 338% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 235M | 5,064% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.24 | 2.00 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.12 | 0.26 | 1,572% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.88 | 10.33 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.65 | 20.56 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.39 | 38.54 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement