Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLSX vs TNVDX
HBLSX vs TNVDX Comparison
Open Charts HBLSX vs TNVDX
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$15.13
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.81B
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income I
Price$10.76
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.64M
HBLSX vs TNVDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLSX vs. TNVDX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLSX is a Hold and TNVDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. TNVDX (91.6M). TNVDX pays higher dividends than HBLSX: TNVDX (3.83) vs HBLSX (3.18). HBLSX was incepted earlier than TNVDX: HBLSX (15 years) vs TNVDX (10 years). TNVDX (1.38) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). TNVDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. HBLSX (61.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than TNVDX: HBLSX (0) vs TNVDX (1000000). HBLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. TNVDX (1.42). HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 15.53 vs. TNVDX (7.06).
| HBLSX | TNVDX | HBLSX / TNVDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.82 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.38 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.741 | 7.723 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 91.6M | 12,882% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 3.83 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 1.42 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.89 | 24.94 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.53 | 7.06 | 220% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement