Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLRX vs RMYCX
HBLRX vs RMYCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLRX vs RMYCX
Hartford Balanced Income R3
Price$15.16
Change-$0.07 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.68B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income C
Price$9.97
Change-$0.04 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.87M
HBLRX vs RMYCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLRX vs. RMYCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLRX is a Buy and RMYCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. RMYCX (293M). RMYCX pays higher dividends than HBLRX: RMYCX (5.08) vs HBLRX (2.90). HBLRX was incepted earlier than RMYCX: HBLRX (15 years) vs RMYCX (11 years). RMYCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than HBLRX (1.28). RMYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. HBLRX (61.00). HBLRX (0) and RMYCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.70 vs. HBLRX (3.26). RMYCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.85 vs. HBLRX (12.18).
| HBLRX | RMYCX | HBLRX / RMYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.75 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.92 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.214 | 11.798 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 293M | 3,993% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.90 | 5.08 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.26 | 9.70 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.18 | 28.57 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.18 | 16.85 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.50 | 34.72 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers