Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLFX vs WBALX
HBLFX vs WBALX Comparison
Open Charts HBLFX vs WBALX
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$14.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.95B
Weitz Conservative Allocation-Inv Cl
Price$17.06
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.93M
HBLFX vs WBALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLFX vs. WBALX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLFX is a Buy and WBALX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. WBALX (235M). HBLFX pays higher dividends than WBALX: HBLFX (3.66) vs WBALX (2.00). HBLFX was incepted earlier than WBALX: HBLFX (8 years) vs WBALX (22 years). WBALX (1.02) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). HBLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. WBALX (27.00). WBALX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: WBALX (2500) vs HBLFX (1000000). HBLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.06 vs. WBALX (2.39). WBALX return over 5 years is better than : 24.27 vs. HBLFX (19.90).
| HBLFX | WBALX | HBLFX / WBALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.85 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.02 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.356 | 2.156 | 295% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12B | 235M | 5,106% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.66 | 2.00 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.06 | 2.39 | 296% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.35 | 16.33 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.90 | 24.27 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.56 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement