Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLFX vs TNVDX
HBLFX vs TNVDX Comparison
Open Charts HBLFX vs TNVDX
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$14.85
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.92B
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income I
Price$10.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.43M
HBLFX vs TNVDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLFX vs. TNVDX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLFX is a Buy and TNVDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. TNVDX (86.4M). TNVDX pays higher dividends than HBLFX: TNVDX (3.89) vs HBLFX (3.66). HBLFX was incepted earlier than TNVDX: HBLFX (8 years) vs TNVDX (9 years). TNVDX (1.38) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). TNVDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. HBLFX (61.00). HBLFX (1000000) and TNVDX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HBLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.44 vs. TNVDX (3.20). HBLFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.90 vs. TNVDX (7.73).
| HBLFX | TNVDX | HBLFX / TNVDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.82 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.38 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.715 | 4.851 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 86.4M | 13,773% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.66 | 3.89 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 3.20 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.69 | 20.98 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.90 | 7.73 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers