Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLFX vs TNVDX
HBLFX vs TNVDX Comparison
Open Charts HBLFX vs TNVDX
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$14.96
Change-$0.08 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.76B
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income I
Price$10.75
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.24M
HBLFX vs TNVDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLFX vs. TNVDX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLFX is a StrongBuy and TNVDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. TNVDX (90.2M). TNVDX pays higher dividends than HBLFX: TNVDX (3.89) vs HBLFX (3.58). HBLFX was incepted earlier than TNVDX: HBLFX (9 years) vs TNVDX (10 years). TNVDX (1.38) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). TNVDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. HBLFX (61.00). HBLFX (1000000) and TNVDX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HBLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.25 vs. TNVDX (0.65). HBLFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.12 vs. TNVDX (9.22).
| HBLFX | TNVDX | HBLFX / TNVDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.82 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.38 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.476 | 7.234 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 90.2M | 13,082% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.58 | 3.89 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.25 | 0.65 | 346% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.40 | 25.26 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.12 | 9.22 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers