Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLFX vs RMYSX
HBLFX vs RMYSX Comparison
Open Charts HBLFX vs RMYSX
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$14.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.91B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income S
Price$9.91
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets289.88M
HBLFX vs RMYSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLFX vs. RMYSX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLFX is a StrongBuy and RMYSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. RMYSX (290M). RMYSX pays higher dividends than HBLFX: RMYSX (5.68) vs HBLFX (3.66). HBLFX was incepted earlier than RMYSX: HBLFX (8 years) vs RMYSX (10 years). RMYSX (0.92) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). RMYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. HBLFX (61.00). RMYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: RMYSX (0) vs HBLFX (1000000). RMYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.73 vs. HBLFX (4.50). RMYSX return over 5 years is better than : 19.72 vs. HBLFX (16.82).
| HBLFX | RMYSX | HBLFX / RMYSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.75 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.92 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.362 | 8.649 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 290M | 4,103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.66 | 5.68 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.50 | 7.73 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.18 | 19.82 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.82 | 19.72 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 37.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers