Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLFX vs RMYSX
HBLFX vs RMYSX Comparison
Open Charts HBLFX vs RMYSX
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$14.96
Change-$0.08 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.76B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income S
Price$10.13
Change+$0.03 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.58M
HBLFX vs RMYSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLFX vs. RMYSX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLFX is a StrongBuy and RMYSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. RMYSX (294M). RMYSX pays higher dividends than HBLFX: RMYSX (5.54) vs HBLFX (3.58). HBLFX was incepted earlier than RMYSX: HBLFX (9 years) vs RMYSX (10 years). RMYSX (0.92) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). RMYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. HBLFX (61.00). RMYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: RMYSX (0) vs HBLFX (1000000). RMYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.88 vs. HBLFX (2.25). RMYSX return over 5 years is better than : 26.12 vs. HBLFX (20.12).
| HBLFX | RMYSX | HBLFX / RMYSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.75 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.92 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.476 | 11.061 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 294M | 4,014% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.58 | 5.54 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.25 | 5.88 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.40 | 39.14 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.12 | 26.12 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers