Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLFX vs MNMRX
HBLFX vs MNMRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLFX vs MNMRX
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$15.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.69B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term R
Price$15.25
Change+$0.04 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets296.79M
HBLFX vs MNMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLFX vs. MNMRX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLFX is a Hold and MNMRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. MNMRX (297M). HBLFX pays higher dividends than MNMRX: HBLFX (3.53) vs MNMRX (1.93). HBLFX was incepted earlier than MNMRX: HBLFX (9 years) vs MNMRX (15 years). MNMRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). HBLFX (61.00) and MNMRX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. MNMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: MNMRX (2000) vs HBLFX (1000000). MNMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.11 vs. HBLFX (2.94). HBLFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.32 vs. MNMRX (-1.14).
| HBLFX | MNMRX | HBLFX / MNMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.28 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.28 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.216 | 7.949 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 297M | 3,939% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.53 | 1.93 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.94 | 3.11 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.87 | 21.10 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.32 | -1.14 | -1,259% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers