Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs WWICX
HBLCX vs WWICX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs WWICX
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.78
Change-$0.08 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.68B
Westwood Income Opportunity C
Price$12.67
Change-$0.11 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets556.39M
HBLCX vs WWICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLCX vs. WWICX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLCX is a Buy and WWICX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. WWICX (556M). WWICX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: WWICX (2.88) vs HBLCX (2.59). HBLCX was incepted earlier than WWICX: HBLCX (19 years) vs WWICX (6 years). WWICX (1.76) is less costly to investors than HBLCX (1.64). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. WWICX (57.00). WWICX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: WWICX (1000) vs HBLCX (2000). WWICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.42 vs. HBLCX (2.86). HBLCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.86 vs. WWICX (9.16).
| HBLCX | WWICX | HBLCX / WWICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.76 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.76 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.895 | 9.762 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 556M | 2,104% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.59 | 2.88 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.86 | 8.42 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.73 | 29.24 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.86 | 9.16 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement