Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs WHGIX
HBLCX vs WHGIX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs WHGIX
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.95B
Westwood Income Opportunity Instl
Price$12.25
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets532.41M
HBLCX vs WHGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLCX vs. WHGIX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLCX is a Buy and WHGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. WHGIX (532M). WHGIX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: WHGIX (4.27) vs HBLCX (2.63). HBLCX was incepted earlier than WHGIX: HBLCX (19 years) vs WHGIX (20 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than WHGIX (0.84). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. WHGIX (57.00). HBLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGIX: HBLCX (2000) vs WHGIX (100000). WHGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.20 vs. HBLCX (5.76). WHGIX return over 5 years is better than : 17.14 vs. HBLCX (13.60).
| HBLCX | WHGIX | HBLCX / WHGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.84 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.84 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.658 | 4.572 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12B | 532M | 2,256% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 4.27 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.76 | 9.20 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.44 | 26.90 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.60 | 17.14 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.78 | 10.03 | 317% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers