Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs TNXAX
HBLCX vs TNXAX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs TNXAX
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.91B
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income A
Price$10.63
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets87.41M
HBLCX vs TNXAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLCX vs. TNXAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLCX is a StrongBuy and TNXAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. TNXAX (87.4M). TNXAX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: TNXAX (3.76) vs HBLCX (2.64). HBLCX was incepted earlier than TNXAX: HBLCX (19 years) vs TNXAX (9 years). HBLCX (1.64) and TNXAX (1.62) have similar cost to investors . TNXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. HBLCX (61.00). TNXAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: TNXAX (1000) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.34 vs. TNXAX (2.00). HBLCX return over 5 years is better than : 10.72 vs. TNXAX (5.39).
| HBLCX | TNXAX | HBLCX / TNXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.07 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.62 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.604 | 5.692 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 87.4M | 13,616% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 3.76 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.34 | 2.00 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.52 | 14.78 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.72 | 5.39 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers