Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs SPDCX
HBLCX vs SPDCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs SPDCX
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.56
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.92B
DWS Multi-Asset Conservative Allc C
Price$13.42
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.08M
HBLCX vs SPDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLCX vs. SPDCX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLCX is a Buy and SPDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. SPDCX (61.1M). HBLCX pays higher dividends than SPDCX: HBLCX (2.63) vs SPDCX (1.97). HBLCX was incepted earlier than SPDCX: HBLCX (19 years) vs SPDCX (25 years). SPDCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than HBLCX (1.64). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. SPDCX (53.00). SPDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: SPDCX (1000) vs HBLCX (2000). SPDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.45 vs. HBLCX (4.21). HBLCX return over 5 years is better than : 10.80 vs. SPDCX (5.33).
| HBLCX | SPDCX | HBLCX / SPDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.78 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 2.07 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.022 | 4.918 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 61.1M | 19,476% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 1.97 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.21 | 4.45 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.90 | 13.39 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.80 | 5.33 | 202% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.33 | 22.47 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement