Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs SPBAX
HBLCX vs SPBAX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs SPBAX
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.84
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.85B
DWS Multi-Asset Conservative Allc S
Price$13.79
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.29M
HBLCX vs SPBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLCX vs. SPBAX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLCX is a Hold and SPBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. SPBAX (61.3M). SPBAX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: SPBAX (2.92) vs HBLCX (2.58). HBLCX was incepted earlier than SPBAX: HBLCX (19 years) vs SPBAX (29 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than SPBAX (0.97). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. SPBAX (53.00). HBLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPBAX: HBLCX (2000) vs SPBAX (2500). SPBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.42 vs. HBLCX (2.58). HBLCX return over 5 years is better than : 12.93 vs. SPBAX (12.28).
| HBLCX | SPBAX | HBLCX / SPBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.78 | 210% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.97 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.749 | 9.381 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 61.3M | 19,413% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 2.92 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.58 | 5.42 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.79 | 29.69 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.93 | 12.28 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.27 | 41.58 | 82% |