Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs RMYSX
HBLCX vs RMYSX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs RMYSX
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.75
Change+$0.07 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.94B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income S
Price$9.99
Change+$0.03 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets291.03M
HBLCX vs RMYSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLCX vs. RMYSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLCX is a StrongBuy and RMYSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. RMYSX (291M). RMYSX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: RMYSX (5.54) vs HBLCX (2.58). HBLCX was incepted earlier than RMYSX: HBLCX (19 years) vs RMYSX (10 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RMYSX (0.92). RMYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. HBLCX (61.00). RMYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: RMYSX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). RMYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.27 vs. HBLCX (2.50). RMYSX return over 5 years is better than : 21.17 vs. HBLCX (11.86).
| HBLCX | RMYSX | HBLCX / RMYSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.75 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.92 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.405 | 10.074 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 291M | 4,089% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 5.54 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.50 | 7.27 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.65 | 28.55 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.86 | 21.17 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.40 | 42.98 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers