Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs MRMUX
HBLCX vs MRMUX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs MRMUX
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.91B
MassMutual 40/60 Allocation I
Price$9.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.41M
HBLCX vs MRMUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLCX vs. MRMUX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLCX is a StrongBuy and MRMUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. MRMUX (148M). MRMUX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: MRMUX (3.28) vs HBLCX (2.64). HBLCX was incepted earlier than MRMUX: HBLCX (19 years) vs MRMUX (11 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than MRMUX (0.59). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. MRMUX (17.00). MRMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: MRMUX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). MRMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.83 vs. HBLCX (3.34). MRMUX (10.93) and HBLCX (10.72) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HBLCX | MRMUX | HBLCX / MRMUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.59 | 278% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.59 | 278% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.604 | 7.208 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 148M | 8,041% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 3.28 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.34 | 6.83 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.52 | 12.87 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.72 | 10.93 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.45 | 25.62 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement