Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs MRMUX
HBLCX vs MRMUX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs MRMUX
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.77
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.94B
MassMutual 40/60 Allocation I
Price$9.50
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.27M
HBLCX vs MRMUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLCX vs. MRMUX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLCX is a StrongBuy and MRMUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. MRMUX (67.3M). MRMUX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: MRMUX (3.22) vs HBLCX (2.58). HBLCX was incepted earlier than MRMUX: HBLCX (19 years) vs MRMUX (11 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than MRMUX (0.59). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. MRMUX (17.00). MRMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: MRMUX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). MRMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.80 vs. HBLCX (3.12). HBLCX (12.24) and MRMUX (12.22) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HBLCX | MRMUX | HBLCX / MRMUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.59 | 278% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.59 | 278% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.624 | 8.894 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 67.3M | 17,682% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 3.22 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.12 | 7.80 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.43 | 18.98 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.24 | 12.22 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.89 | 36.25 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement