Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs MNMWX
HBLCX vs MNMWX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs MNMWX
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.55
Change-$0.20 (-1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.63B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Trm W
Price$14.72
Change-$0.48 (-3.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets287.63M
HBLCX vs MNMWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLCX vs. MNMWX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLCX is a StrongBuy and MNMWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. MNMWX (288M). HBLCX pays higher dividends than MNMWX: HBLCX (2.51) vs MNMWX (2.26). HBLCX was incepted earlier than MNMWX: HBLCX (20 years) vs MNMWX (7 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than MNMWX (0.77). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. MNMWX (70.00). MNMWX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: MNMWX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.20 vs. MNMWX (4.51). MNMWX return over 5 years is better than : 9.98 vs. HBLCX (6.53).
| HBLCX | MNMWX | HBLCX / MNMWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.10 | 1,640% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.77 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.034 | 0.615 | 331% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 288M | 4,028% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.51 | 2.26 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.20 | 4.51 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.82 | 20.09 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.53 | 9.98 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers