Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs IBBFX
HBLCX vs IBBFX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs IBBFX
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.75
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.79B
Thrivent Dynamic Allocation S
Price$14.82
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.13M
HBLCX vs IBBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLCX vs. IBBFX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLCX is a Hold and IBBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. IBBFX (440M). IBBFX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: IBBFX (2.91) vs HBLCX (2.58). HBLCX was incepted earlier than IBBFX: HBLCX (19 years) vs IBBFX (28 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than IBBFX (0.77). IBBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. HBLCX (61.00). HBLCX (2000) and IBBFX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. IBBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.28 vs. HBLCX (1.35). IBBFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.14 vs. HBLCX (11.49).
| HBLCX | IBBFX | HBLCX / IBBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.75 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.77 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.089 | 10.523 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 440M | 2,682% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 2.91 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.35 | 7.28 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.22 | 36.37 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.49 | 30.14 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.29 | 48.28 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers