Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLCX vs HBLSX
HBLCX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts HBLCX vs HBLSX
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.43
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.68B
Hartford Balanced Income R4
Price$14.83
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.68B
HBLCX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLCX vs. HBLSX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLCX is a StrongBuy and HBLSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX (11.7B) and HBLSX (11.7B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . HBLSX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: HBLSX (3.13) vs HBLCX (2.54). HBLCX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: HBLCX (19 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLCX (61.00) and HBLSX (61.00) have comparable annual turnover. HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: HBLSX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.31 vs. HBLCX (5.49). HBLSX return over 5 years is better than : 9.40 vs. HBLCX (5.50).
| HBLCX | HBLSX | HBLCX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.96 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.96 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.744 | 6.585 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 11.7B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 3.13 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.49 | 6.31 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.43 | 17.02 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.50 | 9.40 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.72 | 43.92 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers