Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs TNYRX
HBLAX vs TNYRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs TNYRX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$15.32
Change-$0.04 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.76B
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income R
Price$10.44
Change-$0.39 (-3.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.19M
HBLAX vs TNYRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 5.93B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 93.49M to 11.76B. HBLAX holds the highest valuation in this group at 11.76B. The lowest valued company is TNYRX at 93.49M.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was 1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 7%. HBLAX experienced the highest price growth at 1%, while TNYRX experienced the biggest fall at 0%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
HBLAX vs. TNYRX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and TNYRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. TNYRX (94.2M). TNYRX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: TNYRX (3.63) vs HBLAX (3.23). HBLAX was incepted earlier than TNYRX: HBLAX (19 years) vs TNYRX (10 years). TNYRX (1.88) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). TNYRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. HBLAX (61.00). TNYRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: TNYRX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.06 vs. TNYRX (1.62). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.73 vs. TNYRX (2.03).
| HBLAX | TNYRX | HBLAX / TNYRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.32 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.88 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.110 | 8.651 | 128% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 94.2M | 12,527% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.23 | 3.63 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.06 | 1.62 | 313% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.00 | 16.40 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.73 | 2.03 | 675% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement