Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs TNYRX
HBLAX vs TNYRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs TNYRX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$15.04
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.81B
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income R
Price$10.74
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.64M
HBLAX vs TNYRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. TNYRX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and TNYRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. TNYRX (91.6M). TNYRX (3.37) and HBLAX (3.29) have matching dividends . HBLAX was incepted earlier than TNYRX: HBLAX (19 years) vs TNYRX (10 years). TNYRX (1.88) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). TNYRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. HBLAX (61.00). TNYRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: TNYRX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.20 vs. TNYRX (1.08). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.95 vs. TNYRX (4.57).
| HBLAX | TNYRX | HBLAX / TNYRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.32 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.88 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.795 | 7.471 | 118% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 91.6M | 12,882% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 3.37 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.20 | 1.08 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.19 | 23.27 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.95 | 4.57 | 349% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement