Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs TNVDX
HBLAX vs TNVDX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs TNVDX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.85
Change-$0.18 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.64B
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income I
Price$10.76
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.78M
HBLAX vs TNVDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. TNVDX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a StrongBuy and TNVDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. TNVDX (91.8M). TNVDX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: TNVDX (4.53) vs HBLAX (3.21). HBLAX was incepted earlier than TNVDX: HBLAX (20 years) vs TNVDX (10 years). TNVDX (1.38) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). TNVDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 191.00 vs. HBLAX (90.00). HBLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TNVDX: HBLAX (2000) vs TNVDX (1000000). TNVDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.98 vs. HBLAX (6.08). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.02 vs. TNVDX (9.61).
| HBLAX | TNVDX | HBLAX / TNVDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.82 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.38 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.062 | 2.612 | 79% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 91.8M | 12,636% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.21 | 4.53 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.08 | 7.98 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.65 | 17.38 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.02 | 9.61 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement