Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs TNVDX
HBLAX vs TNVDX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs TNVDX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$15.04
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.81B
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income I
Price$10.76
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.64M
HBLAX vs TNVDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. TNVDX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and TNVDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. TNVDX (91.6M). TNVDX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: TNVDX (3.83) vs HBLAX (3.29). HBLAX was incepted earlier than TNVDX: HBLAX (19 years) vs TNVDX (10 years). TNVDX (1.38) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). TNVDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 136.00 vs. HBLAX (61.00). HBLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TNVDX: HBLAX (2000) vs TNVDX (1000000). HBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.20 vs. TNVDX (1.42). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.95 vs. TNVDX (7.06).
| HBLAX | TNVDX | HBLAX / TNVDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.82 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.38 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.795 | 7.723 | 114% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 91.6M | 12,882% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 3.83 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.20 | 1.42 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.19 | 24.94 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.95 | 7.06 | 226% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement