Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs RMYSX
HBLAX vs RMYSX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs RMYSX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.68B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income S
Price$10.19
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.06M
HBLAX vs RMYSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. RMYSX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a StrongBuy and RMYSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. RMYSX (292M). RMYSX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: RMYSX (5.85) vs HBLAX (3.23). HBLAX was incepted earlier than RMYSX: HBLAX (19 years) vs RMYSX (11 years). RMYSX (0.92) and HBLAX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . RMYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. HBLAX (61.00). RMYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: RMYSX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). RMYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.75 vs. HBLAX (6.37). RMYSX return over 5 years is better than : 19.04 vs. HBLAX (9.84).
| HBLAX | RMYSX | HBLAX / RMYSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.75 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.92 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.698 | 12.592 | 53% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 292M | 4,007% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.23 | 5.85 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 11.75 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.68 | 32.07 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.84 | 19.04 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.92 | 47.46 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers