Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs RMYSX
HBLAX vs RMYSX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs RMYSX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$15.28
Change+$0.10 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.75B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income S
Price$10.24
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets291.91M
HBLAX vs RMYSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. RMYSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and RMYSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. RMYSX (292M). RMYSX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: RMYSX (5.85) vs HBLAX (3.23). HBLAX was incepted earlier than RMYSX: HBLAX (19 years) vs RMYSX (11 years). RMYSX (0.92) and HBLAX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . RMYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. HBLAX (61.00). RMYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: RMYSX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). RMYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.58 vs. HBLAX (2.61). RMYSX return over 5 years is better than : 19.55 vs. HBLAX (12.47).
| HBLAX | RMYSX | HBLAX / RMYSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.75 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.92 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.808 | 12.813 | 77% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 292M | 4,041% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.23 | 5.85 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.61 | 9.58 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.68 | 28.48 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.47 | 19.55 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.23 | 45.78 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers