Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs RMYSX
HBLAX vs RMYSX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs RMYSX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$15.07
Change-$0.08 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.68B
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income S
Price$10.16
Change-$0.04 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.87M
HBLAX vs RMYSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. RMYSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Buy and RMYSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. RMYSX (293M). RMYSX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: RMYSX (5.92) vs HBLAX (3.29). HBLAX was incepted earlier than RMYSX: HBLAX (19 years) vs RMYSX (11 years). RMYSX (0.92) and HBLAX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . RMYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. HBLAX (61.00). RMYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: RMYSX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). RMYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.70 vs. HBLAX (3.69). RMYSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.32 vs. HBLAX (14.22).
| HBLAX | RMYSX | HBLAX / RMYSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.75 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.92 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.591 | 12.702 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 293M | 3,993% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 5.92 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.69 | 10.70 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.49 | 32.24 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.22 | 22.32 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.92 | 46.73 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers