Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs RMLCX
HBLAX vs RMLCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs RMLCX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.85
Change-$0.18 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.64B
Russell Inv Lifepoints Moderate Strat C
Price$9.91
Change+$0.22 (+2.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.78M
HBLAX vs RMLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. RMLCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a StrongBuy and RMLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. RMLCX (124M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than RMLCX: HBLAX (3.21) vs RMLCX (2.80). HBLAX was incepted earlier than RMLCX: HBLAX (20 years) vs RMLCX (27 years). RMLCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. RMLCX (21.00). RMLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: RMLCX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). RMLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.64 vs. HBLAX (6.08). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.02 vs. RMLCX (6.58).
| HBLAX | RMLCX | HBLAX / RMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.77 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.08 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.062 | 1.537 | 134% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 124M | 9,355% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.21 | 2.80 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.08 | 11.64 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.65 | 25.28 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.02 | 6.58 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.80 | 21.39 | 242% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement