Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs RMLCX
HBLAX vs RMLCX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs RMLCX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$15.04
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.81B
Russell Inv Lifepoints Moderate Strat C
Price$9.72
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets126.26M
HBLAX vs RMLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. RMLCX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and RMLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. RMLCX (126M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than RMLCX: HBLAX (3.29) vs RMLCX (2.77). HBLAX was incepted earlier than RMLCX: HBLAX (19 years) vs RMLCX (27 years). RMLCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMLCX (4.00). RMLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: RMLCX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). RMLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.73 vs. HBLAX (2.20). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.95 vs. RMLCX (10.97).
| HBLAX | RMLCX | HBLAX / RMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.77 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 2.08 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.795 | 10.005 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 126M | 9,365% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 2.77 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.20 | 7.73 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.19 | 30.98 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.95 | 10.97 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.19 | 0.49 | 9,153% |