Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs NCBIX
HBLAX vs NCBIX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs NCBIX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$15.07
Change-$0.08 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.68B
New Covenant Balanced Income
Price$23.94
Change-$0.17 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.31M
HBLAX vs NCBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. NCBIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Buy and NCBIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. NCBIX (80.3M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than NCBIX: HBLAX (3.29) vs NCBIX (2.40). HBLAX was incepted earlier than NCBIX: HBLAX (19 years) vs NCBIX (26 years). NCBIX (0.95) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. NCBIX (7.00). NCBIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: NCBIX (500) vs HBLAX (2000). NCBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.12 vs. HBLAX (3.28). NCBIX (14.19) and HBLAX (13.61) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HBLAX | NCBIX | HBLAX / NCBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.90 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.95 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.012 | 10.016 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 80.3M | 14,570% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 2.40 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.28 | 6.12 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.19 | 26.77 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.61 | 14.19 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.05 | 38.65 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers