Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs MNMWX
HBLAX vs MNMWX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs MNMWX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.85
Change-$0.18 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.64B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Trm W
Price$14.72
Change-$0.48 (-3.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets287.63M
HBLAX vs MNMWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. MNMWX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a StrongBuy and MNMWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. MNMWX (288M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than MNMWX: HBLAX (3.21) vs MNMWX (2.26). HBLAX was incepted earlier than MNMWX: HBLAX (20 years) vs MNMWX (7 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than MNMWX (0.77). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. MNMWX (70.00). MNMWX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: MNMWX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.08 vs. MNMWX (4.51). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.02 vs. MNMWX (9.98).
| HBLAX | MNMWX | HBLAX / MNMWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.10 | 890% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.77 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.062 | 0.615 | 335% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 288M | 4,028% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.21 | 2.26 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.08 | 4.51 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.65 | 20.09 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.02 | 9.98 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers