Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs MNMWX
HBLAX vs MNMWX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs MNMWX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$15.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.69B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Trm W
Price$15.40
Change+$0.04 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets298.2M
HBLAX vs MNMWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. MNMWX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Hold and MNMWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. MNMWX (298M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than MNMWX: HBLAX (3.23) vs MNMWX (2.72). HBLAX was incepted earlier than MNMWX: HBLAX (19 years) vs MNMWX (7 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than MNMWX (0.77). HBLAX (61.00) and MNMWX (59.00) have comparable annual turnover. MNMWX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: MNMWX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). MNMWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.32 vs. HBLAX (2.61). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.47 vs. MNMWX (9.19).
| HBLAX | MNMWX | HBLAX / MNMWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.10 | 890% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.77 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.808 | 9.168 | 107% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 298M | 3,926% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.23 | 2.72 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.61 | 4.32 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.68 | 25.43 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.47 | 9.19 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement