Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs MNMRX
HBLAX vs MNMRX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs MNMRX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.85
Change-$0.18 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.64B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Mod Term R
Price$14.62
Change-$0.46 (-3.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets290.51M
HBLAX vs MNMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. MNMRX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a StrongBuy and MNMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. MNMRX (291M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than MNMRX: HBLAX (3.21) vs MNMRX (1.74). HBLAX was incepted earlier than MNMRX: HBLAX (20 years) vs MNMRX (16 years). MNMRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. MNMRX (70.00). HBLAX (2000) and MNMRX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.08 vs. MNMRX (3.26). HBLAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.02 vs. MNMRX (1.42).
| HBLAX | MNMRX | HBLAX / MNMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.28 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.28 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.062 | 0.412 | 500% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 291M | 3,986% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.21 | 1.74 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.08 | 3.26 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.65 | 15.98 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.02 | 1.42 | 775% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.80 | 20.46 | 253% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers