Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HBLAX vs IBBFX
HBLAX vs IBBFX Comparison
Open Charts HBLAX vs IBBFX
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$15.15
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.74B
Thrivent Dynamic Allocation S
Price$15.01
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets443.67M
HBLAX vs IBBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HBLAX vs. IBBFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBLAX is a Buy and IBBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. IBBFX (444M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than IBBFX: HBLAX (3.29) vs IBBFX (2.88). HBLAX was incepted earlier than IBBFX: HBLAX (19 years) vs IBBFX (28 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than IBBFX (0.77). IBBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. HBLAX (61.00). HBLAX (2000) and IBBFX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. IBBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. HBLAX (3.69). IBBFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.77 vs. HBLAX (14.22).
| HBLAX | IBBFX | HBLAX / IBBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.75 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.77 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.591 | 11.940 | 80% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 2000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 444M | 2,635% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 2.88 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.69 | 8.88 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.49 | 32.89 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.22 | 27.77 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.92 | 51.62 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers