HBIA
Price
$73.00
Change
+$0.50 (+0.69%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
605.94M
HFBA
Price
$24.05
Change
-$0.55 (-2.24%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
27.97M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HBIA vs HFBA

Header iconHBIA vs HFBA Comparison
Open Charts HBIA vs HFBABanner chart's image
Hills Ban
Price$73.00
Change+$0.50 (+0.69%)
Volume$3.18K
Capitalization605.94M
HFB Financial
Price$24.05
Change-$0.55 (-2.24%)
Volume$2.2K
Capitalization27.97M
HBIA vs HFBA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HBIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HFBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBIA vs. HFBA commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBIA is a StrongBuy and HFBA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HBIA: $73.00 vs. HFBA: $24.05)
Brand notoriety: HBIA and HFBA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBIA: 33% vs. HFBA: 86%
Market capitalization -- HBIA: $605.94M vs. HFBA: $27.97M
HBIA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $605.94M. HFBA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $27.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBIA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHFBA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HBIA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HFBA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HBIA is a better buy in the long-term than HFBA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBIA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HFBA’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HBIA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HFBA’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBIA is a better buy in the short-term than HFBA.

Price Growth

HBIA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.67% price change this week, while HFBA (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBIA($606M) has a higher market cap than HFBA($28M). HBIA YTD gains are higher at: 4.522 vs. HFBA (-18.684). HFBA has less debt than HBIA: HFBA (28.9M) vs HBIA (220M). HBIA has higher revenues than HFBA: HBIA (146M) vs HFBA (1.57M).
HBIAHFBAHBIA / HFBA
Capitalization606M28M2,164%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.522-18.684-24%
P/E Ratio12.33N/A-
Revenue146M1.57M9,329%
Total CashN/A4.78M-
Total Debt220M28.9M761%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBIA vs HFBA: Fundamental Ratings
HBIA
HFBA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2490
SMR RATING
1..100
2969
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5984
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7614
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
40n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HFBA's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBIA (70). This means that HFBA’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBIA’s over the last 12 months.

HBIA's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HFBA (90). This means that HBIA’s stock grew significantly faster than HFBA’s over the last 12 months.

HBIA's SMR Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HFBA (69). This means that HBIA’s stock grew somewhat faster than HFBA’s over the last 12 months.

HBIA's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as HFBA (84). This means that HBIA’s stock grew similarly to HFBA’s over the last 12 months.

HFBA's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBIA (76). This means that HFBA’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBIA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBIAHFBA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
21%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
16%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
4%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
21%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HBIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HFBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ENGGF16.81N/A
N/A
Enagas S.A.
SHIHF0.22N/A
N/A
SHENZHEN INVT HLDGS BAY AREA DEV CO LTD.
SSEZF24.60N/A
N/A
SSE Plc
TIGCF0.16N/A
-2.33%
Triumph Gold Corp
RCGCF0.05N/A
-3.97%
ROSCAN GOLD CORP.

HBIA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HBIA and BPCGF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HBIA and BPCGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBIA
1D Price
Change %
HBIA100%
+0.69%
BPCGF - HBIA
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HARL - HBIA
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
HCBN - HBIA
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GVYB - HBIA
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HFBA - HBIA
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
More

HFBA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HFBA and BNCZF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HFBA and BNCZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFBA
1D Price
Change %
HFBA100%
-2.24%
BNCZF - HFBA
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFR - HFBA
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
DSBX - HFBA
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RF - HFBA
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
FIBK - HFBA
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
More