HBCYF
Price
$11.55
Change
-$0.58 (-4.78%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
163.92B
SMFNF
Price
$24.75
Change
-$0.13 (-0.52%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
61.94B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HBCYF vs SMFNF

Header iconHBCYF vs SMFNF Comparison
Open Charts HBCYF vs SMFNFBanner chart's image
HSBC Holdings
Price$11.55
Change-$0.58 (-4.78%)
Volume$1.06K
Capitalization163.92B
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group
Price$24.75
Change-$0.13 (-0.52%)
Volume$7
Capitalization61.94B
HBCYF vs SMFNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HBCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBCYF vs. SMFNF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBCYF is a Hold and SMFNF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HBCYF: $11.55 vs. SMFNF: $24.75)
Brand notoriety: HBCYF and SMFNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBCYF: 2% vs. SMFNF: 0%
Market capitalization -- HBCYF: $163.92B vs. SMFNF: $61.94B
HBCYF [@Major Banks] is valued at $163.92B. SMFNF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $61.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBCYF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSMFNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HBCYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SMFNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HBCYF is a better buy in the long-term than SMFNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBCYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMFNF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HBCYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMFNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBCYF is a better buy in the short-term than SMFNF.

Price Growth

HBCYF (@Major Banks) experienced а -2.17% price change this week, while SMFNF (@Major Banks) price change was +0.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.55% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBCYF($164B) has a higher market cap than SMFNF($61.9B). SMFNF has higher P/E ratio than HBCYF: SMFNF (10.93) vs HBCYF (6.92). HBCYF YTD gains are higher at: 26.859 vs. SMFNF (9.513). HBCYF has less debt than SMFNF: HBCYF (85.4B) vs SMFNF (29.38T). SMFNF has higher revenues than HBCYF: SMFNF (3.72T) vs HBCYF (71.3B).
HBCYFSMFNFHBCYF / SMFNF
Capitalization164B61.9B265%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.8599.513282%
P/E Ratio6.9210.9363%
Revenue71.3B3.72T2%
Total Cash327BN/A-
Total Debt85.4B29.38T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBCYF vs SMFNF: Fundamental Ratings
HBCYF
SMFNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
924
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4753
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1780
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMFNF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as HBCYF (56). This means that SMFNF’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as SMFNF (24). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to SMFNF’s over the last 12 months.

SMFNF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as HBCYF (2). This means that SMFNF’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as SMFNF (53). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to SMFNF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMFNF (80). This means that HBCYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMFNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBCYFSMFNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HBCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BELFB100.101.27
+1.29%
Bel Fuse
RNGR12.340.10
+0.82%
Ranger Energy Services
BSX104.320.69
+0.67%
Boston Scientific Corp
SPXC173.030.48
+0.28%
SPX Technologies
AGAE1.81-0.11
-5.73%
Allied Gaming & Entertainment

HBCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCYF has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBCYF jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBCYF
1D Price
Change %
HBCYF100%
-4.80%
HSBC - HBCYF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
SCBFY - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
SMFNF - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCS - HBCYF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
ING - HBCYF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
More

SMFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMFNF and SMFG have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMFNF and SMFG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMFNF
1D Price
Change %
SMFNF100%
N/A
SMFG - SMFNF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.13%
CMWAY - SMFNF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
BACHF - SMFNF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBCYF - SMFNF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.80%
MUFG - SMFNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
More