HBCYF
Price
$11.55
Change
-$0.58 (-4.78%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
163.92B
ING
Price
$22.50
Change
+$0.14 (+0.63%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
54.32B
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HBCYF vs ING

Header iconHBCYF vs ING Comparison
Open Charts HBCYF vs INGBanner chart's image
HSBC Holdings
Price$11.55
Change-$0.58 (-4.78%)
Volume$1.06K
Capitalization163.92B
ING Groep
Price$22.50
Change+$0.14 (+0.63%)
Volume$1.46M
Capitalization54.32B
HBCYF vs ING Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HBCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ING
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBCYF vs. ING commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBCYF is a Hold and ING is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HBCYF: $11.55 vs. ING: $22.50)
Brand notoriety: HBCYF and ING are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBCYF: 2% vs. ING: 71%
Market capitalization -- HBCYF: $163.92B vs. ING: $54.32B
HBCYF [@Major Banks] is valued at $163.92B. ING’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $54.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBCYF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileING’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HBCYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • ING’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HBCYF and ING are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBCYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ING’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HBCYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ING’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBCYF is a better buy in the short-term than ING.

Price Growth

HBCYF (@Major Banks) experienced а -2.17% price change this week, while ING (@Major Banks) price change was +5.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

ING is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.55% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBCYF($164B) has a higher market cap than ING($54.3B). ING has higher P/E ratio than HBCYF: ING (7.46) vs HBCYF (6.92). ING YTD gains are higher at: 51.016 vs. HBCYF (26.859). HBCYF has less debt than ING: HBCYF (85.4B) vs ING (150B). HBCYF has higher revenues than ING: HBCYF (71.3B) vs ING (22.4B).
HBCYFINGHBCYF / ING
Capitalization164B54.3B302%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.85951.01653%
P/E Ratio6.927.4693%
Revenue71.3B22.4B318%
Total Cash327BN/A-
Total Debt85.4B150B57%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBCYF vs ING: Fundamental Ratings
HBCYF
ING
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
23
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1731
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HBCYF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as ING (60) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

ING's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as HBCYF (9) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as ING (3) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

ING's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as HBCYF (47) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as ING (31) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBCYFING
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HBCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ING
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TLPFF102.901.36
+1.34%
Teleperformance
PBF24.100.27
+1.13%
PBF Energy
GCO22.25-0.12
-0.54%
Genesco
OMCC5.80-0.05
-0.85%
Old Market Capital Corporation
CBRL66.88-1.05
-1.55%
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store

HBCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCYF has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBCYF jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBCYF
1D Price
Change %
HBCYF100%
-4.80%
HSBC - HBCYF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
SCBFY - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
SMFNF - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCS - HBCYF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
ING - HBCYF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
More

ING and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ING has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ING jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ING
1D Price
Change %
ING100%
+0.63%
SAN - ING
76%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
BBVA - ING
76%
Closely correlated
+1.49%
HSBC - ING
68%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
AAVMY - ING
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.94%
BCS - ING
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.13%
More