HBCYF
Price
$13.71
Change
+$0.03 (+0.22%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
238.11B
ING
Price
$25.96
Change
+$0.36 (+1.41%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
75.42B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HBCYF vs ING

Header iconHBCYF vs ING Comparison
Open Charts HBCYF vs INGBanner chart's image
HSBC Holdings
Price$13.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
Volume$469
Capitalization238.11B
ING Groep
Price$25.96
Change+$0.36 (+1.41%)
Volume$1.87M
Capitalization75.42B
HBCYF vs ING Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HBCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ING
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBCYF vs. ING commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBCYF is a StrongBuy and ING is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (HBCYF: $13.71 vs. ING: $25.96)
Brand notoriety: HBCYF and ING are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBCYF: 3% vs. ING: 70%
Market capitalization -- HBCYF: $238.11B vs. ING: $75.42B
HBCYF [@Major Banks] is valued at $238.11B. ING’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $75.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $869.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $136.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBCYF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileING’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HBCYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • ING’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, ING is a better buy in the long-term than HBCYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBCYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ING’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HBCYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ING’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBCYF is a better buy in the short-term than ING.

Price Growth

HBCYF (@Major Banks) experienced а -1.84% price change this week, while ING (@Major Banks) price change was +2.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +130.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

ING is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.79% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBCYF($238B) has a higher market cap than ING($75.4B). HBCYF has higher P/E ratio than ING: HBCYF (13.58) vs ING (11.11). ING YTD gains are higher at: 77.176 vs. HBCYF (51.804). HBCYF has less debt than ING: HBCYF (130B) vs ING (168B). HBCYF has higher revenues than ING: HBCYF (69.1B) vs ING (22.6B).
HBCYFINGHBCYF / ING
Capitalization238B75.4B316%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD51.80477.17667%
P/E Ratio13.5811.11122%
Revenue69.1B22.6B306%
Total Cash246BN/A-
Total Debt130B168B77%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBCYF vs ING: Fundamental Ratings
HBCYF
ING
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1010
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55
SMR RATING
1..100
34
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1118
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a47

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ING's Valuation (64) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as HBCYF (80) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

ING's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as HBCYF (5) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as ING (4) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

ING's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as HBCYF (43) in the null industry. This means that ING’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

HBCYF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as ING (18) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to ING’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBCYFING
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HBCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ING
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UYG99.231.35
+1.38%
ProShares Ultra Financials
BSMP24.520.02
+0.06%
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Muncpl Bd ETF
TLTP22.760.01
+0.04%
Amplify Bloomberg U.S.Trs 12% Prm IncETF
ADFI8.58-0.02
-0.23%
Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
IBIT61.94-0.16
-0.26%
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF

HBCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCYF has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBCYF jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBCYF
1D Price
Change %
HBCYF100%
+0.29%
HSBC - HBCYF
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
SCBFY - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.73%
SMFNF - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
BCS - HBCYF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
ING - HBCYF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
More

ING and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ING has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ING jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ING
1D Price
Change %
ING100%
+1.41%
SAN - ING
74%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
BBVA - ING
72%
Closely correlated
+2.45%
HSBC - ING
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
AAVMY - ING
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
BCS - ING
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
More