HBCYF
Price
$9.40
Change
-$0.17 (-1.78%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
HSBC
Price
$48.27
Change
+$0.12 (+0.25%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
64 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HBCYF vs HSBC

Header iconHBCYF vs HSBC Comparison
Open Charts HBCYF vs HSBCBanner chart's image
HSBC Holdings
Price$9.40
Change-$0.17 (-1.78%)
Volume$17.05K
CapitalizationN/A
HSBC Holdings
Price$48.27
Change+$0.12 (+0.25%)
Volume$1.25M
CapitalizationN/A
HBCYF vs HSBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
HSBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBCYF vs. HSBC commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBCYF is a Hold and HSBC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (HBCYF: $9.40 vs. HSBC: $48.27)
Brand notoriety: HBCYF: Not notable vs. HSBC: Notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBCYF: 161% vs. HSBC: 116%
Market capitalization -- HBCYF: $163.92B vs. HSBC: $148.14B
HBCYF [@Major Banks] is valued at $163.92B. HSBC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $148.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBCYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHSBC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HBCYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HSBC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HBCYF and HSBC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HSBC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HSBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

HBCYF (@Major Banks) experienced а -1.21% price change this week, while HSBC (@Major Banks) price change was -0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

HSBC is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-1.31% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBCYF($164B) has a higher market cap than HSBC($148B). HBCYF (6.92) and HSBC (6.90) have similar P/E ratio . HSBC YTD gains are higher at: 31.232 vs. HBCYF (29.591). HBCYF has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. HSBC (286B). HBCYF has less debt than HSBC: HBCYF (85.4B) vs HSBC (235B). HBCYF has higher revenues than HSBC: HBCYF (71.3B) vs HSBC (63B).
HBCYFHSBCHBCYF / HSBC
Capitalization164B148B111%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD29.59131.23295%
P/E Ratio6.926.90100%
Revenue71.3B63B113%
Total Cash327B286B114%
Total Debt85.4B235B36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBCYF vs HSBC: Fundamental Ratings
HBCYF
HSBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2827
SMR RATING
1..100
22
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4122
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HBCYF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as HSBC (48) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HBCYF’s stock grew similarly to HSBC’s over the last 12 months.

HSBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HBCYF (28) in the null industry. This means that HSBC’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

HSBC's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HBCYF (2) in the null industry. This means that HSBC’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

HSBC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HBCYF (44) in the null industry. This means that HSBC’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

HSBC's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HBCYF (41) in the null industry. This means that HSBC’s stock grew similarly to HBCYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HSBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HSBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

HBCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCYF has been loosely correlated with HSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBCYF jumps, then HSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBCYF
1D Price
Change %
HBCYF100%
-1.83%
HSBC - HBCYF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
SCBFY - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
SMFNF - HBCYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+6.60%
BCS - HBCYF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
ING - HBCYF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
More

HSBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HSBC has been loosely correlated with SCBFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HSBC jumps, then SCBFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HSBC
1D Price
Change %
HSBC100%
+0.25%
SCBFY - HSBC
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
BCS - HSBC
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
ING - HSBC
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
HBCYF - HSBC
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
SAN - HSBC
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
More