HBCP
Price
$56.93
Change
+$0.88 (+1.57%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
438.45M
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NSTS
Price
$11.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
54.51M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HBCP vs NSTS

Header iconHBCP vs NSTS Comparison
Open Charts HBCP vs NSTSBanner chart's image
Home Ban
Price$56.93
Change+$0.88 (+1.57%)
Volume$318
Capitalization438.45M
NSTS Ban
Price$11.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$127
Capitalization54.51M
HBCP vs NSTS Comparison Chart in %
HBCP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NSTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBCP vs. NSTS commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBCP is a StrongBuy and NSTS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (HBCP: $55.65 vs. NSTS: $11.25)
Brand notoriety: HBCP and NSTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBCP: 11% vs. NSTS: 98%
Market capitalization -- HBCP: $438.45M vs. NSTS: $54.51M
HBCP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $438.45M. NSTS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $54.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBCP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNSTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HBCP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NSTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HBCP is a better buy in the long-term than NSTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBCP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSTS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HBCP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NSTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBCP is a better buy in the short-term than NSTS.

Price Growth

HBCP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.59% price change this week, while NSTS (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

HBCP is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.92% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBCP($438M) has a higher market cap than NSTS($54.5M). HBCP YTD gains are higher at: 23.120 vs. NSTS (-4.623). NSTS has less debt than HBCP: NSTS (26.9M) vs HBCP (148M). HBCP has higher revenues than NSTS: HBCP (146M) vs NSTS (9.12M).
HBCPNSTSHBCP / NSTS
Capitalization438M54.5M804%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.120-4.623-500%
P/E Ratio9.97N/A-
Revenue146M9.12M1,602%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt148M26.9M550%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBCP: Fundamental Ratings
HBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18
SMR RATING
1..100
37
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBCPNSTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
27%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
26%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
33%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HBCP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NSTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHPIX33.72N/A
N/A
ProFunds Pharmaceuticals UltraSector Inv
OLVCX21.24N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Large Cap Value C
UIWGX34.92N/A
N/A
Victory Sustainable World Institutional
NSRSX55.59N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth R6
HFSSX17.06N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders Intl Cntrrn Val SDR

HBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCP has been closely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBCP jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBCP
1D Price
Change %
HBCP100%
-0.61%
EFSC - HBCP
81%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
WSFS - HBCP
81%
Closely correlated
-1.37%
FRME - HBCP
80%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
SMBC - HBCP
80%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
STEL - HBCP
80%
Closely correlated
-1.02%
More

NSTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSTS has been loosely correlated with FULTP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NSTS jumps, then FULTP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSTS
1D Price
Change %
NSTS100%
+0.92%
FULTP - NSTS
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
FGBIP - NSTS
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
PFIS - NSTS
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
SMBK - NSTS
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
HBCP - NSTS
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
More