HBCP
Price
$54.75
Change
+$0.24 (+0.44%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
428.75M
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LSBK
Price
$14.31
Change
-$0.04 (-0.28%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
110.04M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HBCP vs LSBK

Header iconHBCP vs LSBK Comparison
Open Charts HBCP vs LSBKBanner chart's image
Home Ban
Price$54.75
Change+$0.24 (+0.44%)
Volume$39.61K
Capitalization428.75M
Lake Shore Ban
Price$14.31
Change-$0.04 (-0.28%)
Volume$24.32K
Capitalization110.04M
HBCP vs LSBK Comparison Chart in %
HBCP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LSBK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBCP vs. LSBK commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBCP is a Buy and LSBK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (HBCP: $54.51 vs. LSBK: $14.35)
Brand notoriety: HBCP and LSBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBCP: 56% vs. LSBK: 33%
Market capitalization -- HBCP: $428.75M vs. LSBK: $110.04M
HBCP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $428.75M. LSBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $110.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBCP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLSBK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HBCP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LSBK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HBCP is a better buy in the long-term than LSBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBCP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LSBK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HBCP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LSBK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBCP is a better buy in the short-term than LSBK.

Price Growth

HBCP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.09% price change this week, while LSBK (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

HBCP is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBCP($429M) has a higher market cap than LSBK($110M). LSBK has higher P/E ratio than HBCP: LSBK (14.91) vs HBCP (9.75). HBCP YTD gains are higher at: 20.598 vs. LSBK (7.122). LSBK has less debt than HBCP: LSBK (2M) vs HBCP (148M). HBCP has higher revenues than LSBK: HBCP (146M) vs LSBK (25.7M).
HBCPLSBKHBCP / LSBK
Capitalization429M110M390%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.5987.122289%
P/E Ratio9.7514.9165%
Revenue146M25.7M568%
Total CashN/A2.93M-
Total Debt148M2M7,400%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBCP vs LSBK: Fundamental Ratings
HBCP
LSBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
419
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1957
SMR RATING
1..100
3774
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6266
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HBCP's Valuation (32) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSBK (67). This means that HBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSBK’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSBK (57). This means that HBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSBK’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's SMR Rating (37) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSBK (74). This means that HBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSBK’s over the last 12 months.

LSBK's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as HBCP (50). This means that LSBK’s stock grew similarly to HBCP’s over the last 12 months.

HBCP's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as LSBK (66). This means that HBCP’s stock grew similarly to LSBK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBCPLSBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
33%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HBCP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LSBK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HZNOF7.850.48
+6.51%
DEXTERRA GROUP INC.
BOUYY9.510.12
+1.22%
Bouygues SA
SSHPF0.22N/A
N/A
Vow ASA
SHCAY1.35-0.03
-2.53%
Sharp Corp.
OPHRF0.02N/A
-13.04%
OPHIR METALS CORP.

HBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBCP has been closely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBCP jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBCP
1D Price
Change %
HBCP100%
-0.78%
EFSC - HBCP
81%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
STEL - HBCP
80%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
SMBC - HBCP
80%
Closely correlated
-0.47%
FRME - HBCP
80%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
UCB - HBCP
79%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
More

LSBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSBK has been loosely correlated with MGYR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LSBK jumps, then MGYR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSBK
1D Price
Change %
LSBK100%
-0.28%
MGYR - LSBK
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
OPHC - LSBK
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
CFBK - LSBK
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
CMA - LSBK
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
HBCP - LSBK
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
More