Advertisement
HBANP vs UMBF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBANP is a Buy and UMBF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HBANP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUMBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HBANP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UMBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HBANP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMBF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HBANP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
- UMBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
HBANP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.62% price change this week, while UMBF (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
UMBF is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+2.32% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| HBANP | UMBF | HBANP / UMBF | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 9.72B | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.106 | 11.231 | 19% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 13.78 | - |
| Revenue | 7.95B | 2.16B | 368% |
| Total Cash | 1.7B | 1.07B | 158% |
| Total Debt | 17.4B | 252M | 6,905% |
HBANP | UMBF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 44 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HBANP's Valuation (4) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UMBF (56). This means that HBANP’s stock grew somewhat faster than UMBF’s over the last 12 months.
UMBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBANP (100). This means that UMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBANP’s over the last 12 months.
UMBF's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for HBANP (100). This means that UMBF’s stock grew significantly faster than HBANP’s over the last 12 months.
UMBF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HBANP (56). This means that UMBF’s stock grew similarly to HBANP’s over the last 12 months.
UMBF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBANP (100). This means that UMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBANP’s over the last 12 months.
| HBANP | UMBF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 35% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 30% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 39% | 21 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 10 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 26% | 1 day ago 63% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KAUG | 27.19 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Aug | |||
| JHML | 81.76 | -0.45 | -0.54% |
| JHancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF | |||
| ETU | 8.11 | -0.17 | -2.05% |
| T-REX 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF | |||
| SVXY | 54.17 | -1.18 | -2.13% |
| ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures | |||
| JDST | 1.83 | -0.19 | -9.41% |
| Direxion Daily Jr Gld Mnrs Bear 2X ETF | |||
HBANP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBANP has been closely correlated with FITBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBANP jumps, then FITBO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HBANP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBANP | 100% | -1.47% | ||
| FITBO - HBANP | 68% Closely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| OZKAP - HBANP | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| UMBF - HBANP | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| PFS - HBANP | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| HBANL - HBANP | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
More | ||||
UMBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMBF has been closely correlated with FULT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMBF jumps, then FULT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMBF | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| FULT - UMBF | 89% Closely correlated | +2.66% | ||
| ONB - UMBF | 89% Closely correlated | +1.97% | ||
| FNB - UMBF | 88% Closely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| HWC - UMBF | 88% Closely correlated | +3.15% | ||
| TRMK - UMBF | 88% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||