HBANM
Price
$22.50
Change
-$0.10 (-0.44%)
Updated
Jul 7, 02:17 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
MBINM
Price
$24.87
Change
-$0.02 (-0.08%)
Updated
Jul 7, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

HBANM vs MBINM

Header iconHBANM vs MBINM Comparison
Open Charts HBANM vs MBINMBanner chart's image
Huntington Bancshares
Price$22.50
Change-$0.10 (-0.44%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Merchants Ban
Price$24.87
Change-$0.02 (-0.08%)
Volume$1.4K
CapitalizationN/A
HBANM vs MBINM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HBANM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBINM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBANM vs. MBINM commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBANM is a Hold and MBINM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HBANM: $22.60 vs. MBINM: $24.89)
Brand notoriety: HBANM and MBINM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBANM: 43% vs. MBINM: 178%
Market capitalization -- HBANM: $0 vs. MBINM: $0
HBANM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. MBINM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBANM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBINM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HBANM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBINM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HBANM and MBINM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBANM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBINM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HBANM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MBINM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBANM is a better buy in the short-term than MBINM.

Price Growth

HBANM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.12% price change this week, while MBINM (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBINM YTD gains are higher at: 0.952 vs. HBANM (-7.568). HBANM has more cash in the bank: 1.56B vs. MBINM (10.6M). MBINM has less debt than HBANM: MBINM (964M) vs HBANM (12.4B). HBANM has higher revenues than MBINM: HBANM (7.36B) vs MBINM (559M).
HBANMMBINMHBANM / MBINM
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.5680.952-795%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue7.36B559M1,317%
Total Cash1.56B10.6M14,698%
Total Debt12.4B964M1,286%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBANMMBINM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
22%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
31%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
17%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
21%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HBANM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBINM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PDSB1.330.06
+4.72%
PDS Biotechnology Corp
CXW21.680.64
+3.04%
CoreCivic
SHBI16.630.29
+1.77%
Shore Bancshares
FRMEP25.32N/A
N/A
First Merchants Corp
AYI305.38-0.64
-0.21%
Acuity Inc

HBANM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBANM has been loosely correlated with FITBP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HBANM jumps, then FITBP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBANM
1D Price
Change %
HBANM100%
+0.18%
FITBP - HBANM
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
HBANP - HBANM
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FCNCO - HBANM
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
WTFCP - HBANM
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
FITBO - HBANM
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
More

MBINM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBINM has been loosely correlated with FITBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBINM jumps, then FITBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBINM
1D Price
Change %
MBINM100%
-0.13%
FITBI - MBINM
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OZKAP - MBINM
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
FITBO - MBINM
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
ONBPO - MBINM
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBANM - MBINM
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
More