HBAN
Price
$19.04
Change
+$0.64 (+3.48%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
38.59B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MFG
Price
$9.29
Change
+$0.40 (+4.50%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
114.55B
98 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HBAN vs MFG

Header iconHBAN vs MFG Comparison
Open Charts HBAN vs MFGBanner chart's image
Huntington Bancshares
Price$19.04
Change+$0.64 (+3.48%)
Volume$709.32K
Capitalization38.59B
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$9.29
Change+$0.40 (+4.50%)
Volume$6.03M
Capitalization114.55B
HBAN vs MFG Comparison Chart in %
HBAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HBAN vs. MFG commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HBAN is a Buy and MFG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (HBAN: $19.02 vs. MFG: $9.29)
Brand notoriety: HBAN: Notable vs. MFG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HBAN: 209% vs. MFG: 161%
Market capitalization -- HBAN: $38.59B vs. MFG: $114.55B
HBAN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $38.59B. MFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $114.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $162.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HBAN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HBAN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the long-term than HBAN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HBAN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HBAN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the short-term than HBAN.

Price Growth

HBAN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +11.49% price change this week, while MFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

HBAN is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

MFG is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.20% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($115B) has a higher market cap than HBAN($38.6B). MFG has higher P/E ratio than HBAN: MFG (17.16) vs HBAN (13.68). MFG YTD gains are higher at: 21.448 vs. HBAN (5.994). HBAN has less debt than MFG: HBAN (17.4B) vs MFG (24.87T). MFG has higher revenues than HBAN: MFG (3.7T) vs HBAN (7.95B).
HBANMFGHBAN / MFG
Capitalization38.6B115B34%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.99421.44828%
P/E Ratio13.6817.1680%
Revenue7.95B3.7T0%
Total Cash1.7BN/A-
Total Debt17.4B24.87T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HBAN vs MFG: Fundamental Ratings
HBAN
MFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8488
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
458
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2539
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5521
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HBAN's Valuation (76) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (78) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HBAN’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBAN (45) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBAN’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HBAN (6) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to HBAN’s over the last 12 months.

HBAN's Price Growth Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (39) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HBAN’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBAN (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBAN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HBANMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HBAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSMV21.300.03
+0.13%
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Muncpl Bd ETF
IUS59.880.01
+0.02%
Invesco RAFI™ Strategic US ETF
NBTR50.50N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Total Return Bond ETF
FDRV16.56-0.02
-0.12%
Fidelity Elctrc Vhcls & Ftr Trnsptn ETF
IWP134.18-1.97
-1.45%
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF

HBAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBAN has been closely correlated with CFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBAN jumps, then CFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBAN
1D Price
Change %
HBAN100%
+2.85%
CFG - HBAN
92%
Closely correlated
+1.71%
PNC - HBAN
92%
Closely correlated
+2.72%
FITB - HBAN
91%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
FNB - HBAN
91%
Closely correlated
+2.52%
TFC - HBAN
90%
Closely correlated
+2.60%
More

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been closely correlated with SUTNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then SUTNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
+0.57%
SUTNY - MFG
71%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
DB - MFG
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
NWG - MFG
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
HBAN - MFG
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.85%
TFC - MFG
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.60%
More