HAS
Price
$86.89
Change
+$1.47 (+1.72%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.99B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XPOF
Price
$8.22
Change
+$0.21 (+2.62%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
281.7M
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAS vs XPOF

Header iconHAS vs XPOF Comparison
Open Charts HAS vs XPOFBanner chart's image
Hasbro
Price$86.89
Change+$1.47 (+1.72%)
Volume$25.25K
Capitalization11.99B
Xponential Fitness
Price$8.22
Change+$0.21 (+2.62%)
Volume$1.25K
Capitalization281.7M
HAS vs XPOF Comparison Chart in %
HAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XPOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAS vs. XPOF commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAS is a Hold and XPOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (HAS: $85.42 vs. XPOF: $8.01)
Brand notoriety: HAS and XPOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAS: 88% vs. XPOF: 43%
Market capitalization -- HAS: $11.99B vs. XPOF: $281.7M
HAS [@Recreational Products] is valued at $11.99B. XPOF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $281.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $29.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileXPOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • XPOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAS is a better buy in the long-term than XPOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XPOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • XPOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HAS is a better buy in the short-term than XPOF.

Price Growth

HAS (@Recreational Products) experienced а -1.84% price change this week, while XPOF (@Recreational Products) price change was -1.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +2.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAS is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

XPOF is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+2.26% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAS($12B) has a higher market cap than XPOF($282M). XPOF (26.61) and HAS (25.60) have similar P/E ratio . HAS YTD gains are higher at: 4.171 vs. XPOF (-2.673). XPOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.98M vs. HAS (-72.9M). HAS has more cash in the bank: 621M vs. XPOF (24.8M). XPOF has less debt than HAS: XPOF (380M) vs HAS (3.35B). HAS has higher revenues than XPOF: HAS (4.36B) vs XPOF (315M).
HASXPOFHAS / XPOF
Capitalization12B282M4,255%
EBITDA-72.9M-6.98M1,044%
Gain YTD4.171-2.673-156%
P/E Ratio25.6026.6196%
Revenue4.36B315M1,383%
Total Cash621M24.8M2,504%
Total Debt3.35B380M881%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAS: Fundamental Ratings
HAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
62
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HASXPOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XPOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EWUS42.720.17
+0.40%
iShares MSCI United Kingdom Small-Cp ETF
TAPR25.940.03
+0.11%
Innovator Eq Dfnd Prt ETF-2 Yr toApr2027
PHYL35.690.01
+0.04%
PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF
PHT8.32N/A
N/A
Pioneer High Income Fund
QCAP23.74-0.03
-0.12%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Cnsrv Buffr ETF - Apr

HAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAS has been loosely correlated with MAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HAS jumps, then MAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAS
1D Price
Change %
HAS100%
-1.67%
MAT - HAS
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.53%
YETI - HAS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
GOLF - HAS
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.52%
JAKK - HAS
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.10%
FNKO - HAS
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
More

XPOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XPOF and JAKK have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XPOF and JAKK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XPOF
1D Price
Change %
XPOF100%
N/A
JAKK - XPOF
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.10%
FNKO - XPOF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
YETI - XPOF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
LTH - XPOF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.63%
HAS - XPOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
More