HAS
Price
$74.98
Change
-$0.07 (-0.09%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.84B
88 days until earnings call
PII
Price
$50.22
Change
+$0.61 (+1.23%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.65B
2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAS vs PII

Header iconHAS vs PII Comparison
Open Charts HAS vs PIIBanner chart's image
Hasbro
Price$74.98
Change-$0.07 (-0.09%)
Volume$2.54M
Capitalization7.84B
Polaris
Price$50.22
Change+$0.61 (+1.23%)
Volume$1.1M
Capitalization5.65B
HAS vs PII Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAS vs. PII commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAS is a Buy and PII is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (HAS: $74.98 vs. PII: $50.22)
Brand notoriety: HAS and PII are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAS: 115% vs. PII: 71%
Market capitalization -- HAS: $7.84B vs. PII: $5.65B
HAS [@Recreational Products] is valued at $7.84B. PII’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $5.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePII’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HAS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PII’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAS is a better buy in the long-term than PII.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PII’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PII’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PII is a better buy in the short-term than HAS.

Price Growth

HAS (@Recreational Products) experienced а -3.64% price change this week, while PII (@Recreational Products) price change was +7.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAS is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

PII is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+1.26% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAS($7.84B) has a higher market cap than PII($5.66B). HAS has higher P/E ratio than PII: HAS (75.76) vs PII (11.36). HAS YTD gains are higher at: 36.968 vs. PII (-9.985). PII has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1B vs. HAS (-863.2M). HAS has more cash in the bank: 545M vs. PII (368M). PII has less debt than HAS: PII (2.05B) vs HAS (3.5B). PII has higher revenues than HAS: PII (8.93B) vs HAS (5B).
HASPIIHAS / PII
Capitalization7.84B5.66B139%
EBITDA-863.2M1B-86%
Gain YTD36.968-9.985-370%
P/E Ratio75.7611.36667%
Revenue5B8.93B56%
Total Cash545M368M148%
Total Debt3.5B2.05B170%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAS vs PII: Fundamental Ratings
HAS
PII
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5891
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75100
SMR RATING
1..100
2586
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
522
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAS's Valuation (32) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PII (89). This means that HAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PII’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as PII (100). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to PII’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's SMR Rating (25) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PII (86). This means that HAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PII’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as PII (42). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to PII’s over the last 12 months.

PII's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAS (52). This means that PII’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HASPII
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IVOV98.810.53
+0.54%
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
OCTT41.000.10
+0.25%
AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF
CAFX24.900.05
+0.18%
Congress Intermediate Bond ETF
BNY9.39-0.01
-0.11%
BlackRock New York Municipal Income Trust
KBUF31.21-0.34
-1.09%
KraneShares 90% KWEB Dfnd Outcm Jan27ETF

HAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAS has been loosely correlated with MAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HAS jumps, then MAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAS
1D Price
Change %
HAS100%
-0.09%
MAT - HAS
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.23%
BC - HAS
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.36%
HOG - HAS
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.50%
YETI - HAS
56%
Loosely correlated
+5.60%
PII - HAS
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
More

PII and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PII has been closely correlated with BC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PII jumps, then BC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PII
1D Price
Change %
PII100%
+1.23%
BC - PII
83%
Closely correlated
+2.36%
LCII - PII
77%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
MBUU - PII
77%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
HOG - PII
75%
Closely correlated
+2.50%
WGO - PII
70%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
More