HAS
Price
$96.59
Change
+$1.93 (+2.04%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
13.56B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MMA
Price
$0.75
Change
-$0.10 (-11.76%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
19.76M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAS vs MMA

Header iconHAS vs MMA Comparison
Open Charts HAS vs MMABanner chart's image
Hasbro
Price$96.59
Change+$1.93 (+2.04%)
Volume$1.81M
Capitalization13.56B
Mixed Martial Arts Group
Price$0.75
Change-$0.10 (-11.76%)
Volume$3.95M
Capitalization19.76M
HAS vs MMA Comparison Chart in %
HAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAS vs. MMA commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAS is a StrongBuy and MMA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (HAS: $96.59 vs. MMA: $0.75)
Brand notoriety: HAS and MMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAS: 112% vs. MMA: 1421%
Market capitalization -- HAS: $13.56B vs. MMA: $19.76M
HAS [@Recreational Products] is valued at $13.56B. MMA’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $19.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $28.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMMA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAS is a better buy in the long-term than MMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HAS is a better buy in the short-term than MMA.

Price Growth

HAS (@Recreational Products) experienced а +7.47% price change this week, while MMA (@Recreational Products) price change was -14.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAS is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-1.36% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAS($13.6B) has a higher market cap than MMA($19.8M). HAS YTD gains are higher at: 17.793 vs. MMA (-33.393).
HASMMAHAS / MMA
Capitalization13.6B19.8M68,687%
EBITDA-72.9MN/A-
Gain YTD17.793-33.393-53%
P/E Ratio25.60N/A-
Revenue4.36BN/A-
Total Cash621MN/A-
Total Debt3.35BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAS: Fundamental Ratings
HAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
16
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HASMMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KNGZ38.280.55
+1.46%
FirstTrust S&P500 DvrsDiv AristocratsETF
DDFS21.28-0.01
-0.07%
Innovator Eq Dual Drctnl 15 Buf ETF -Sep
GFEB41.86-0.05
-0.13%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Feb
PBOC29.24-0.10
-0.35%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Oct
FWD109.21-3.76
-3.33%
AB Disruptors ETF

HAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAS has been closely correlated with YETI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAS jumps, then YETI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAS
1D Price
Change %
HAS100%
+2.04%
YETI - HAS
71%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
MAT - HAS
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
GOLF - HAS
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.56%
FNKO - HAS
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.92%
ESCA - HAS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
More

MMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MMA and DOGZ have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MMA and DOGZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMA
1D Price
Change %
MMA100%
-12.22%
DOGZ - MMA
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.17%
PRKS - MMA
29%
Poorly correlated
+6.53%
LUCK - MMA
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
GDHG - MMA
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
HAS - MMA
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
More