HAS
Price
$95.86
Change
+$1.20 (+1.27%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:49 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.28B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MAT
Price
$21.04
Change
-$0.16 (-0.76%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.58B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAS vs MAT

Header iconHAS vs MAT Comparison
Open Charts HAS vs MATBanner chart's image
Hasbro
Price$95.86
Change+$1.20 (+1.27%)
Volume$3.2K
Capitalization13.28B
Mattel
Price$21.04
Change-$0.16 (-0.76%)
Volume$5.63K
Capitalization6.58B
HAS vs MAT Comparison Chart in %
HAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAS vs. MAT commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAS is a StrongBuy and MAT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (HAS: $94.66 vs. MAT: $21.19)
Brand notoriety: HAS and MAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAS: 128% vs. MAT: 81%
Market capitalization -- HAS: $13.28B vs. MAT: $6.58B
HAS [@Recreational Products] is valued at $13.28B. MAT’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $6.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $28.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HAS and MAT are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HAS is a better buy in the short-term than MAT.

Price Growth

HAS (@Recreational Products) experienced а +5.54% price change this week, while MAT (@Recreational Products) price change was +4.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAS is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

MAT is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-1.23% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAS($13.3B) has a higher market cap than MAT($6.58B). HAS has higher P/E ratio than MAT: HAS (25.60) vs MAT (16.05). HAS YTD gains are higher at: 15.439 vs. MAT (6.804). MAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 835M vs. HAS (-72.9M). MAT has more cash in the bank: 692M vs. HAS (621M). MAT has less debt than HAS: MAT (2.68B) vs HAS (3.35B). MAT has higher revenues than HAS: MAT (5.23B) vs HAS (4.36B).
HASMATHAS / MAT
Capitalization13.3B6.58B202%
EBITDA-72.9M835M-9%
Gain YTD15.4396.804227%
P/E Ratio25.6016.05160%
Revenue4.36B5.23B83%
Total Cash621M692M90%
Total Debt3.35B2.68B125%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAS vs MAT: Fundamental Ratings
HAS
MAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1576
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7681
SMR RATING
1..100
9847
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4919
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAS's Valuation (33) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAT (90). This means that HAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAT’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as MAT (81). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to MAT’s over the last 12 months.

MAT's SMR Rating (47) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAS (98). This means that MAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAS’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's Price Growth Rating (6) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAT (47). This means that HAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAT’s over the last 12 months.

MAT's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as HAS (49). This means that MAT’s stock grew similarly to HAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HASMAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSDD105.978.71
+8.96%
GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF
PREF19.080.02
+0.10%
Principal Spectrum Pref Secs Actv ETF
EDOW42.660.04
+0.10%
First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF
NDIA29.41-0.03
-0.11%
Global X India Active ETF
VLLU24.23-0.11
-0.46%
Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF

HAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAS has been loosely correlated with MAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HAS jumps, then MAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAS
1D Price
Change %
HAS100%
+0.87%
MAT - HAS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
GOLF - HAS
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
YETI - HAS
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
JAKK - HAS
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.22%
JOUT - HAS
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.43%
More

MAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAT has been loosely correlated with JAKK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MAT jumps, then JAKK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAT
1D Price
Change %
MAT100%
-0.24%
JAKK - MAT
64%
Loosely correlated
-3.22%
HAS - MAT
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
YETI - MAT
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
GOLF - MAT
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AS - MAT
48%
Loosely correlated
-5.32%
More