HAS
Price
$67.81
Change
-$1.69 (-2.43%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
7.84B
46 days until earnings call
MAT
Price
$18.80
Change
-$0.50 (-2.59%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.81B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAS vs MAT

Header iconHAS vs MAT Comparison
Open Charts HAS vs MATBanner chart's image
Hasbro
Price$67.81
Change-$1.69 (-2.43%)
Volume$1.69M
Capitalization7.84B
Mattel
Price$18.80
Change-$0.50 (-2.59%)
Volume$1.89M
Capitalization6.81B
HAS vs MAT Comparison Chart
Loading...
HAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAS vs. MAT commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAS is a Hold and MAT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (HAS: $67.81 vs. MAT: $18.80)
Brand notoriety: HAS and MAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAS: 80% vs. MAT: 44%
Market capitalization -- HAS: $7.84B vs. MAT: $6.81B
HAS [@Recreational Products] is valued at $7.84B. MAT’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $6.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMAT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HAS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MAT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAS is a better buy in the long-term than MAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HAS is a better buy in the short-term than MAT.

Price Growth

HAS (@Recreational Products) experienced а +2.25% price change this week, while MAT (@Recreational Products) price change was -0.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

MAT is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-0.65% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAS($7.84B) has a higher market cap than MAT($6.82B). HAS has higher P/E ratio than MAT: HAS (75.76) vs MAT (32.81). HAS YTD gains are higher at: 23.871 vs. MAT (6.035). MAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 767M vs. HAS (-863.2M). MAT has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. HAS (545M). MAT has less debt than HAS: MAT (2.59B) vs HAS (3.5B). MAT has higher revenues than HAS: MAT (5.44B) vs HAS (5B).
HASMATHAS / MAT
Capitalization7.84B6.82B115%
EBITDA-863.2M767M-113%
Gain YTD23.8716.035396%
P/E Ratio75.7632.81231%
Revenue5B5.44B92%
Total Cash545M1.26B43%
Total Debt3.5B2.59B135%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAS vs MAT: Fundamental Ratings
HAS
MAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1967
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7646
SMR RATING
1..100
2538
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1656
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6692
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAS's Valuation (22) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAT (85). This means that HAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAT’s over the last 12 months.

MAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as HAS (76). This means that MAT’s stock grew similarly to HAS’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's SMR Rating (25) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as MAT (38). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to MAT’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAT (56). This means that HAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAT’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as MAT (92). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to MAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HASMAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XHG1.33N/A
N/A
Xchange TEC Inc
DEI14.93-0.20
-1.32%
Douglas Emmett
CTEV37.11-0.64
-1.70%
Claritev Corporation
BMRN56.22-1.06
-1.85%
BioMarin Pharmaceutical
KEQU37.06-1.79
-4.61%
Kewaunee Scientific Corp

HAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAS has been loosely correlated with MAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HAS jumps, then MAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAS
1D Price
Change %
HAS100%
-2.43%
MAT - HAS
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.59%
BC - HAS
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.00%
HOG - HAS
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.54%
PII - HAS
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.54%
JAKK - HAS
54%
Loosely correlated
-8.00%
More

MAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAT has been loosely correlated with HAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MAT jumps, then HAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAT
1D Price
Change %
MAT100%
-2.59%
HAS - MAT
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.43%
JAKK - MAT
56%
Loosely correlated
-8.00%
YETI - MAT
51%
Loosely correlated
-4.61%
GOLF - MAT
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.92%
BC - MAT
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.00%
More