HAS
Price
$81.63
Change
+$0.22 (+0.27%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
11.46B
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ISPO
Price
$4.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
52.93M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HAS vs ISPO

Header iconHAS vs ISPO Comparison
Open Charts HAS vs ISPOBanner chart's image
Hasbro
Price$81.63
Change+$0.22 (+0.27%)
Volume$349.34K
Capitalization11.46B
Inspirato
Price$4.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$153.01K
Capitalization52.93M
HAS vs ISPO Comparison Chart in %
HAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ISPO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HAS vs. ISPO commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAS is a StrongBuy and ISPO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (HAS: $81.63 vs. ISPO: $4.16)
Brand notoriety: HAS and ISPO are both not notable
HAS represents the Recreational Products, while ISPO is part of the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HAS: 18% vs. ISPO: 60%
Market capitalization -- HAS: $11.46B vs. ISPO: $52.93M
HAS [@Recreational Products] is valued at $11.46B. ISPO’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $52.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $30.42B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $175.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.67B. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HAS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileISPO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ISPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAS is a better buy in the long-term than ISPO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ISPO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HAS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ISPO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ISPO is a better buy in the short-term than HAS.

Price Growth

HAS (@Recreational Products) experienced а +0.34% price change this week, while ISPO (@Consumer Sundries) price change was -0.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.60%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +2.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAS is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+0.09% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

@Consumer Sundries (+2.79% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAS($11.5B) has a higher market cap than ISPO($52.9M). HAS has higher P/E ratio than ISPO: HAS (25.60) vs ISPO (3.18). HAS YTD gains are higher at: 50.432 vs. ISPO (25.301). ISPO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 55.2M vs. HAS (-72.9M). HAS has more cash in the bank: 621M vs. ISPO (13.7M). ISPO has less debt than HAS: ISPO (181M) vs HAS (3.35B). HAS has higher revenues than ISPO: HAS (4.36B) vs ISPO (248M).
HASISPOHAS / ISPO
Capitalization11.5B52.9M21,739%
EBITDA-72.9M55.2M-132%
Gain YTD50.43225.301199%
P/E Ratio25.603.18804%
Revenue4.36B248M1,757%
Total Cash621M13.7M4,533%
Total Debt3.35B181M1,849%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAS: Fundamental Ratings
HAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
76
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
26
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HASISPO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ISPO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XJUL39.130.06
+0.16%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Jul
CSPF25.980.03
+0.12%
Cohen & Steers Pref & Inc Oppos Act ETF
PHT8.32N/A
N/A
Pioneer High Income Fund
ABAKF2.07N/A
N/A
ABRDN ASIA-PAC INCOME FD
IAUM44.66-0.17
-0.38%
iShares® Gold Trust Micro

HAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAS has been loosely correlated with MAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HAS jumps, then MAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAS
1D Price
Change %
HAS100%
+0.27%
MAT - HAS
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
YETI - HAS
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
GOLF - HAS
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
JAKK - HAS
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
AS - HAS
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
More

ISPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ISPO and HAS have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISPO and HAS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ISPO
1D Price
Change %
ISPO100%
N/A
HAS - ISPO
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
CUK - ISPO
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
MAT - ISPO
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
LTH - ISPO
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
PRKS - ISPO
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
More