Advertisement
HAPS vs TOWN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAPS is a Hold and TOWN is a Hold.
TOWN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HAPS | TOWN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 73% | 7 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 71% | 7 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 74% | 7 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 65% | 7 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 71% | 7 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BINIX | 32.07 | N/A | N/A |
| Baron International Growth Institutional | |||
| PZISX | 13.49 | N/A | N/A |
| Pzena Small Cap Value Institutional | |||
| GATMX | 16.56 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs International T/M Eq A | |||
| FSRNX | 16.55 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Real Estate Index | |||
| CGVFX | 28.29 | N/A | N/A |
| American Funds Global Insight 529-F-1 | |||
HAPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAPS has been closely correlated with WAFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAPS jumps, then WAFD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAPS | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| WAFD - HAPS | 76% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| PIPR - HAPS | 74% Closely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| WSBC - HAPS | 73% Closely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| HRI - HAPS | 71% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| TOWN - HAPS | 71% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||
TOWN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOWN has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TOWN jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOWN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOWN | 100% | -0.77% | ||
| UBSI - TOWN | 86% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| TRMK - TOWN | 85% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| FMBH - TOWN | 84% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| UCB - TOWN | 84% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| PEBO - TOWN | 84% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
More | ||||