Advertisement
HAPS vs TOWN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAPS is a Hold and TOWN is a Hold.
TOWN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HAPS | TOWN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 58% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DHSYX | 27.35 | 0.37 | +1.37% |
| Diamond Hill Small Cap Y | |||
| JCICX | 87.28 | 0.29 | +0.33% |
| JPMorgan U.S. GARP Equity C | |||
| TGCNX | 21.84 | 0.05 | +0.23% |
| TCW Concentrated Large Cap Growth N Cl | |||
| WCMWX | 18.97 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| WCM Focused Emerging Mkts Ex Chn Inst | |||
| FCTGX | 31.93 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth M | |||
HAPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAPS has been closely correlated with WAFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAPS jumps, then WAFD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAPS | 100% | N/A | ||
| WAFD - HAPS | 76% Closely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| PIPR - HAPS | 74% Closely correlated | +3.75% | ||
| WSBC - HAPS | 73% Closely correlated | +2.31% | ||
| HRI - HAPS | 71% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| TOWN - HAPS | 71% Closely correlated | +2.71% | ||
More | ||||
TOWN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOWN has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TOWN jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOWN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOWN | 100% | +2.71% | ||
| UBSI - TOWN | 86% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| PEBO - TOWN | 85% Closely correlated | +2.30% | ||
| TRMK - TOWN | 85% Closely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| FMBH - TOWN | 84% Closely correlated | +2.62% | ||
| SRCE - TOWN | 84% Closely correlated | +1.77% | ||
More | ||||