Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HAPS vs SCHA
HAPS vs SCHA Comparison
Open Charts HAPS vs SCHA
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Sm CapETF
Price$30.96
Change-$0.42 (-1.34%)
Volume$133
Net Assets140.91M
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$27.86
Change+$0.26 (+0.94%)
Volume$13.39K
Net Assets18.71B
HAPS vs SCHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HAPS vs. SCHA commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAPS is a Hold and SCHA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 18.7B vs. HAPS (141M). SCHA has a higher annual dividend yield than HAPS: SCHA (8.695) vs HAPS (5.831). HAPS was incepted earlier than SCHA: HAPS (2 years) vs SCHA (16 years). SCHA (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than HAPS (0.60). HAPS has a higher turnover SCHA (11.00) vs SCHA (11.00).
| HAPS | SCHA | HAPS / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | 5.831 | 8.695 | 67% |
| Net Assets | 141M | 18.7B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.04 | 1,500% |
| Turnover | 96.00 | 11.00 | 873% |
| Yield | 0.68 | 1.45 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HAPS | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
HAPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAPS has been closely correlated with WAFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAPS jumps, then WAFD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAPS | 100% | -1.32% | ||
| WAFD - HAPS | 76% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| PIPR - HAPS | 74% Closely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| WSBC - HAPS | 73% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| HRI - HAPS | 71% Closely correlated | -2.65% | ||
| VBTX - HAPS | 71% Closely correlated | -0.21% | ||
More | ||||
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | +0.96% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.70% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.90% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.43% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
More | ||||