Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HAPS vs IWM
HAPS vs IWM Comparison
Open Charts HAPS vs IWM
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Sm CapETF
Price$32.08
Change+$0.22 (+0.69%)
Volume$931
Net Assets146.69M
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Price$251.42
Change-$1.29 (-0.51%)
Volume$9.22K
Net Assets76.97B
HAPS vs IWM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HAPS vs. IWM commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HAPS is a Buy and IWM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWM has more net assets: 77B vs. HAPS (147M). IWM has a higher annual dividend yield than HAPS: IWM (15.268) vs HAPS (9.637). HAPS was incepted earlier than IWM: HAPS (3 years) vs IWM (26 years). IWM (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than HAPS (0.60). HAPS has a higher turnover IWM (18.00) vs IWM (18.00).
| HAPS | IWM | HAPS / IWM | |
| Gain YTD | 9.637 | 15.268 | 63% |
| Net Assets | 147M | 77B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.19 | 316% |
| Turnover | 96.00 | 18.00 | 533% |
| Yield | 0.67 | 0.97 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| HAPS | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
HAPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAPS has been closely correlated with WAFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAPS jumps, then WAFD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAPS | 100% | +0.67% | ||
| WAFD - HAPS | 76% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| PIPR - HAPS | 74% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| WSBC - HAPS | 73% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| HRI - HAPS | 71% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| TOWN - HAPS | 71% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
More | ||||
IWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWM has been closely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWM jumps, then APG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWM | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| APG - IWM | 68% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| SSD - IWM | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| CVNA - IWM | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| FIX - IWM | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| ONTO - IWM | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
More | ||||